Prospect Info: Alexander Holtz (#7 pick - 2020 draft)

Status
Not open for further replies.

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,556
25,560
Brooklyn, NY
His modeling/evaluation is based entirely on comps for the player’s age, height, weight, basic statistical production, and league (similar to NHLe). So there’s no actual subjective analysis that’s going into his opinion. It’s purely statistical modeling.

Statistical modeling without visual or contextual analysis is also silly. It's like taking a close-up photo of a coarse, black hair and trying to convince everyone that it's Bigfoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,556
25,560
Brooklyn, NY
But it's so much easier to develop a model, scrape stats off of league websites, and make pretty charts about who's gonna be good.

Haha! It's funny, though. I try not to get involved in the analytics argument because I think analytics are terrific when used in tandem with contextual analyses of players.

The problem is with the litany of "hockey writers" who literally watch the Kardashians instead of the hockey game, then go look at a chart the next day and think they know more about what happened in the hockey game than the people who actually watched the hockey game.
 

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,131
Calgary Alberta
Stats and game tape don't show things like how a player handles himself on and off the ice. Player X could be amazing statistically , but be a "me first" type player who doesn't listen to the coaching staff or is engaged on the bench talking to his linemates , listening to his coach asking for pointers , going over game film to improve , working out in the gym whenever possible . Skates over to the ref after a goal to make sure he gets credit for the point etc etc etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Blackjack

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
18,205
15,084
keyjhboardd +bro]ke
Visit site
Haha! It's funny, though. I try not to get involved in the analytics argument because I think analytics are terrific when used in tandem with contextual analyses of players.

The problem is with the litany of "hockey writers" who literally watch the Kardashians instead of the hockey game, then go look at a chart the next day and think they know more about what happened in the hockey game than the people who actually watched the hockey game.

There is some legitimately good thinking behind some of those models, I don't mean to be too dismissive, but there are so many wrinkles going on with young player development, numbers alone will just never be able to tell the story. I mean, you look at Alex Holtz, the first half he had, the second half he had, and now this playoff game, and can you really say that his stat line describes his season?

Have you watched any of Will Scouch's videos this year? He's changed his methods a little bit, especially with respect to how he looks at defenseman, and he's got videos for Jake Martin and Simon Edvinsson up on his channel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

TheDuke93

Registered User
May 29, 2017
2,832
2,386
NJ
Haha! It's funny, though. I try not to get involved in the analytics argument because I think analytics are terrific when used in tandem with contextual analyses of players.

The problem is with the litany of "hockey writers" who literally watch the Kardashians instead of the hockey game, then go look at a chart the next day and think they know more about what happened in the hockey game than the people who actually watched the hockey game.
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,576
13,992
Pretty sure that guy still thinks Gusev can be a great player based off his model. Even after seeing how bad his skating is.

I think Gusev can be a good NHLer still, he just won't ever get that chance. He never looked comfortable this season - his timing was off. Gusev is a precision player who never looked precise, and no one's going to take a chance on him now at the money he'll be looking for.

As it relates to Holtz's season - players get better and worse by numbers all the time for reasons we can't quite guess at, and this takes the guesswork out of it. It's going to be wrong sometimes, wildly wrong. I still believe it would beat the market, and it would definitely beat the market 10 years ago.
 

Figgie

Registered User
Apr 24, 2018
492
613
Finland
If Djurgården lose today so they season is over. Is the quarantine 1 week or 2 weeks if you are coming from Europe to USA?

I am just thinking that if Holtz season ends today and he would sign right after that contract with Devils so how long would it take that he could start practice with the team.


Edit: ahhh is there also that stupid visa thing what takes a lot of time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Figgie

Registered User
Apr 24, 2018
492
613
Finland
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?

That would make Holtz at least better player. Impossible say would he be top3 but maybe Detroit would have taken Holtz over Raymond or am I very wrong? Maybe @StevenToddIves can help us? :thumbu:
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,556
25,560
Brooklyn, NY
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?

Not top 3, but last year's top 3 was ridiculously good.

Also, I like Holtz's compete. It's just not an off-the-charts elite quality like it is with Mercer. Dawson Mercer's compete level is quite simply as good as it gets. Maybe a better question would be where we would have ranked Mercer if he had Tim Stutzle's skating ability.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,556
25,560
Brooklyn, NY
I think Gusev can be a good NHLer still, he just won't ever get that chance. He never looked comfortable this season - his timing was off. Gusev is a precision player who never looked precise, and no one's going to take a chance on him now at the money he'll be looking for.

As it relates to Holtz's season - players get better and worse by numbers all the time for reasons we can't quite guess at, and this takes the guesswork out of it. It's going to be wrong sometimes, wildly wrong. I still believe it would beat the market, and it would definitely beat the market 10 years ago.

Well, my counterpoint would be that we can guess at what makes a player get better and worse -- by actually watching them play. This is not to say that you do not, of course -- but occasional hockey writers who have only found the time to watch one or two Devils games all year will have some pretty absurd opinions based on lazily relying on purely analytic models of context.

Gusev surely had a chance to make some sort of impact at the NHL level -- he was certainly a decent player last season. But ultimately, it was his skating limitations and 200-foot play which lowered him in Coach Ruff's estimation. I expect him back in the KHL next year, but you never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,556
25,560
Brooklyn, NY
That would make Holtz at least better player. Impossible say would he be top3 but maybe Detroit would have taken Holtz over Raymond or am I very wrong? Maybe @StevenToddIves can help us? :thumbu:

Raymond is still a "line driver" while Holtz is still a "finisher" -- I think this was crucial in Detroit's thinking when they took Raymond.
 

TheDuke93

Registered User
May 29, 2017
2,832
2,386
NJ
Raymond is still a "line driver" while Holtz is still a "finisher" -- I think this was crucial in Detroit's thinking when they took Raymond.
So when it comes to forwards in particular, you usually have sub categories.
1. Line Drivers 2. Playmakers 3. Finishers 4. Puck Retrievers 7. Two-way 6. Defensive 7. Bad
Obviously players can fit into more then on category. While Ovechkin is the greatest Finisher we have ever seen he certainly is a line driver and an underrated playmaker. When it comes to prospects outside of a select few most players will make the league based off of the one thing they thrive at. Based off of all of this would say Line Drivers are the most impactful?
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
32,901
32,081
NJ
I think Gusev can be a good NHLer still, he just won't ever get that chance. He never looked comfortable this season - his timing was off. Gusev is a precision player who never looked precise, and no one's going to take a chance on him now at the money he'll be looking for.

As it relates to Holtz's season - players get better and worse by numbers all the time for reasons we can't quite guess at, and this takes the guesswork out of it. It's going to be wrong sometimes, wildly wrong. I still believe it would beat the market, and it would definitely beat the market 10 years ago.

He also literally was very very good last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Statistical modeling without visual or contextual analysis is also silly. It's like taking a close-up photo of a coarse, black hair and trying to convince everyone that it's Bigfoot.

So, that Patterson film stats analysis is flawed? I had Bigfoot in my mid-teens for this draft. His younger brother, Mediumfoot went high in his junior league import draft and the NHLe on him is already through the roof.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
If there is a way to sign Holtz to some sort of amateur tryout type of deal or PTO for this season great, but I'm not sure I want this season to count as a year on an ELC. He's barely 19. I'd start him fresh next season in Binghamton and go from there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,436
16,752
If there is a way to sign Holtz to some sort of amateur tryout type of deal or PTO for this season great, but I'm not sure I want this season to count as a year on an ELC. He's barely 19. I'd start him fresh next season in Binghamton and go from there.

On the other hand, if the team thinks he needs almost a full AHL season next year, and the year after would be his rookie season in the NHL then you may want to burn the first year right now so that you can sign his next contract after 1 NHL season rather than 2.

I do think it will slide as I doubt he plays 7 NHL games this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad