You’d love the results of his modeling, our top three developing young players (Nico doesn’t qualify) are Hughes, Smith, and, uh, Reilly Walsh? Then Mercer and Holtz.
Heh.
He was in Vogue?
You’d love the results of his modeling, our top three developing young players (Nico doesn’t qualify) are Hughes, Smith, and, uh, Reilly Walsh? Then Mercer and Holtz.
Heh.
His modeling/evaluation is based entirely on comps for the player’s age, height, weight, basic statistical production, and league (similar to NHLe). So there’s no actual subjective analysis that’s going into his opinion. It’s purely statistical modeling.
Statistical modeling without visual or contextual analysis is also silly. It's like taking a close-up photo of a coarse, black hair and trying to convince everyone that it's Bigfoot.
But it's so much easier to develop a model, scrape stats off of league websites, and make pretty charts about who's gonna be good.
Pretty sure that guy still thinks Gusev can be a great player based off his model. Even after seeing how bad his skating is.But it's so much easier to develop a model, scrape stats off of league websites, and make pretty charts about who's gonna be good.
Haha! It's funny, though. I try not to get involved in the analytics argument because I think analytics are terrific when used in tandem with contextual analyses of players.
The problem is with the litany of "hockey writers" who literally watch the Kardashians instead of the hockey game, then go look at a chart the next day and think they know more about what happened in the hockey game than the people who actually watched the hockey game.
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?Haha! It's funny, though. I try not to get involved in the analytics argument because I think analytics are terrific when used in tandem with contextual analyses of players.
The problem is with the litany of "hockey writers" who literally watch the Kardashians instead of the hockey game, then go look at a chart the next day and think they know more about what happened in the hockey game than the people who actually watched the hockey game.
Pretty sure that guy still thinks Gusev can be a great player based off his model. Even after seeing how bad his skating is.
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?
Random question, 100% hypothetical and most likely impossible to answer but I would love to hear your opinion on this. But if you put Mercers compete into Holtz would he be a top 3 pick last draft?
I think Gusev can be a good NHLer still, he just won't ever get that chance. He never looked comfortable this season - his timing was off. Gusev is a precision player who never looked precise, and no one's going to take a chance on him now at the money he'll be looking for.
As it relates to Holtz's season - players get better and worse by numbers all the time for reasons we can't quite guess at, and this takes the guesswork out of it. It's going to be wrong sometimes, wildly wrong. I still believe it would beat the market, and it would definitely beat the market 10 years ago.
That would make Holtz at least better player. Impossible say would he be top3 but maybe Detroit would have taken Holtz over Raymond or am I very wrong? Maybe @StevenToddIves can help us?
So when it comes to forwards in particular, you usually have sub categories.Raymond is still a "line driver" while Holtz is still a "finisher" -- I think this was crucial in Detroit's thinking when they took Raymond.
I think Gusev can be a good NHLer still, he just won't ever get that chance. He never looked comfortable this season - his timing was off. Gusev is a precision player who never looked precise, and no one's going to take a chance on him now at the money he'll be looking for.
As it relates to Holtz's season - players get better and worse by numbers all the time for reasons we can't quite guess at, and this takes the guesswork out of it. It's going to be wrong sometimes, wildly wrong. I still believe it would beat the market, and it would definitely beat the market 10 years ago.
Looks like Holtz might be applying for a Visa soon.
Statistical modeling without visual or contextual analysis is also silly. It's like taking a close-up photo of a coarse, black hair and trying to convince everyone that it's Bigfoot.
If there is a way to sign Holtz to some sort of amateur tryout type of deal or PTO for this season great, but I'm not sure I want this season to count as a year on an ELC. He's barely 19. I'd start him fresh next season in Binghamton and go from there.
If there is a way to sign Holtz to some sort of amateur tryout type of deal or PTO for this season great, but I'm not sure I want this season to count as a year on an ELC. He's barely 19. I'd start him fresh next season in Binghamton and go from there.
Would like Holtz in the AHL full-time next season to get used to NA ice
is that possible?