SteveCangialosi123
Registered User
I don't know if the hit that Holtz had got posted here yet but here it is.
That’s charging??
I don't know if the hit that Holtz had got posted here yet but here it is.
That’s an awful charging call under NHL rules. I don’t know if the SHL has a different standard.
Holtz is just following the puck that was passed; he couldn’t possibly have been lining the player up.
Calls like that are why euro's are so soft.
How tf is that charging lol.
Calls like that are why euro's are so soft.
Holtz is a beast.
He is. He isn't going to drive play, but he doesn't have to. Think he will be the type of young winger the team desperately needs.
There is a reason, despite the relative success of Mercer in his league and the lack of success of Holtz in his that I still believe Holtz is much closer to NHL ready. He is a physical specimen and I don't think the rigors of the NHL game will wear on him the way they would on Mercer. And he still looked more dynamic to my eye in the WJC than Mercer. Not taking anything away from Mercer at all. I just like Holtz.
I saw this on twitter and don't no what to make of it. @StevenToddIves I'm bat signaling you when you get a chance.
I was kidding.Maybe the SHL but the KHL tends to have a lot of fights and dirty hits. The whole KHL is soft is something that always perplexes me seeing how Russia dominates the USA and especially Canada in wrestling and MMA. They are tough motherf***ers.
Thanks brother, appreciate that.This guy looks at the number of points scored by prospects, and models a theoretical "NHL equivalent" to those points according to which league they're scored in.
Essentially the chart is saying that the Holtz scored the equivalent of 30 NHL points in the SHL this year, and Mercer has scored the equivalent of 34 NHL points in the Q. Based on those "NHL equivalent" points, he's saying that they both have a 22% chance of being stars in the NHL.
It's interesting, but ultimately meaningless.
Thanks brother, appreciate that.
This guy looks at the number of points scored by prospects, and models a theoretical "NHL equivalent" to those points according to which league they're scored in.
Essentially the chart is saying that the Holtz scored the equivalent of 30 NHL points in the SHL this year, and Mercer has scored the equivalent of 34 NHL points in the Q. Based on those "NHL equivalent" points, he's saying that they both have a 22% chance of being stars in the NHL.
It's interesting, but ultimately meaningless.
It also matters how you slice the baloney. Mercer’s late season PPG would have resulted in a better NHL equivalent while Hoktz’s would have been much worse.
I saw this on twitter and don't no what to make of it. @StevenToddIves I'm bat signaling you when you get a chance.
Thank you good sir. I thought it made no sense when. I read it but verification from you and blackjack was appreciated.That's a silly tweet. Holtz has been up and down in his draft+1 season, but Mercer has been absolutely dominant -- from the WJC to the QMJHL. It's just not an informed or educated opinion to me, so I have trouble responding to it.
Thank you good sir. I thought it made no sense when. I read it but verification from you and blackjack was appreciated.
I saw this on twitter and don't no what to make of it. @StevenToddIves I'm bat signaling you when you get a chance.
Always listen to @Blackjack -- the dude is an absolute ace at finding and processing information.
You’d love the results of his modeling, our top three developing young players (Nico doesn’t qualify) are Hughes, Smith, and, uh, Reilly Walsh? Then Mercer and Holtz.That's a silly tweet. Holtz has been up and down in his draft+1 season, but Mercer has been absolutely dominant -- from the WJC to the QMJHL. It's just not an informed or educated opinion to me, so I have trouble responding to it.
That's a silly tweet. Holtz has been up and down in his draft+1 season, but Mercer has been absolutely dominant -- from the WJC to the QMJHL. It's just not an informed or educated opinion to me, so I have trouble responding to it.