Player Discussion Adam Ruzicka

HighLifeMan

#SnowyStrong
Feb 26, 2009
7,303
2,471
Don't know how we didn't at least get a pick for him....

Because when you put players in positions where they can't showcase or play to their strengths - they don't hold value.

It's exactly how we ended up having to pay a 1st to move Monahan. You can't play these types of players on the 4th line and just expect them to find success at the highest level in a role they have literally never played at during any point in their careers.

I am not even saying Ruzicka is a slam dunk or even a good bet to have NHL success, but at the very least get an honest look at him in the appropriate role. What does this mess of a roster have to lose? Even if he fails in a top nine role then other teams would have seen that as well and then he's in your AHL contributing there.
 

joescores

Registered User
Mar 21, 2011
2,169
1,463
Don't know how we didn't at least get a pick for him....
Conroy/Huska's blue print

Because when you put players in positions where they can't showcase or play to their strengths - they don't hold value.

It's exactly how we ended up having to pay a 1st to move Monahan. You can't play these types of players on the 4th line and just expect them to find success at the highest level in a role they have literally never played at during any point in their careers.

I am not even saying Ruzicka is a slam dunk or even a good bet to have NHL success, but at the very least get an honest look at him in the appropriate role. What does this mess of a roster have to lose? Even if he fails in a top nine role then other teams would have seen that as well and then he's in your AHL contributing there.
👏 Bravo, you got this.

Why not giving him till Pospi is back his second line duties?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,496
54,783
Weegartown
He's not a good center and we have a million LHS LWers
this seemed kind of inevitable with Pospisil finding some success.

Still wish it could have gone different, really just didn't seem right after he took that hit against the Rangers.
 

User1996

Registered User
Jun 24, 2020
2,901
1,754
Wouldn’t have hated seeing him play C with better line mates post Lindholm trade, but oh well.

Really don’t think this warrants a huge reaction about mismanagement of players - has to be one of the most inconsequential players in the NHL. You’ll only notice him, good or bad, maybe once a game. Just no real impact either way - he’s just there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RasmusAndersson

joescores

Registered User
Mar 21, 2011
2,169
1,463
Wouldn’t have hated seeing him play C with better line mates post Lindholm trade, but oh well.

Really don’t think this warrants a huge reaction about mismanagement of players - has to be one of the most inconsequential players in the NHL. You’ll only notice him, good or bad, maybe once a game. Just no real impact either way - he’s just there.
But this was only noticeable after his injury this season- he had bad injury and rushed back. There was plenty of games at the start of the season in which he played the par but his line mates in top 9 were fumbling his passes. He also hit 3 posts in his next 5 games after he returned then was dropped and played with non NHLers like Dube and Duehr.

He had 20 pts in 44 games under that tool last season and his system produced f*** all goals in general.

You wanted to get rid? Fine, boost his value, get a low pick for him.

Absolute nits the pair of them (Hus and Conan)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

RasmusAndersson

Registered User
Oct 19, 2013
2,457
804
Conroy/Huska's blue print


👏 Bravo, you got this.

Why not giving him till Pospi is back his second line duties?
Don't know how we didn't at least get a pick for him....
We were never getting a pick for him lol he’s on pace for 6 goals and 17 pts over a full season at age 24. The 10 worst teams in the league didn’t even try to claim him for free.

Ruzicka is not a top-9 guy and isn’t ideal for a 4th line role either. Maybe he finds a role on a 3rd line somewhere but losing him is completely inconsequential. We woulda just let him walk this summer anyway
 

Haatley

haatley
Jun 9, 2011
6,999
1,875
Toronto
Because when you put players in positions where they can't showcase or play to their strengths - they don't hold value.

It's exactly how we ended up having to pay a 1st to move Monahan. You can't play these types of players on the 4th line and just expect them to find success at the highest level in a role they have literally never played at during any point in their careers.

I am not even saying Ruzicka is a slam dunk or even a good bet to have NHL success, but at the very least get an honest look at him in the appropriate role. What does this mess of a roster have to lose? Even if he fails in a top nine role then other teams would have seen that as well and then he's in your AHL contributing there.
This is nothing like Monahan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: User1996

joescores

Registered User
Mar 21, 2011
2,169
1,463
We were never getting a pick for him lol he’s on pace for 6 goals and 17 pts over a full season at age 24. The 10 worst teams in the league didn’t even try to claim him for free.

Ruzicka is not a top-9 guy and isn’t ideal for a 4th line role either. Maybe he finds a role on a 3rd line somewhere but losing him is completely inconsequential. We woulda just let him walk this summer anyway
I vehemently disagree, keep an eye on him.
 

User1996

Registered User
Jun 24, 2020
2,901
1,754
But this was only noticeable after his injury this season- he had bad injury and rushed back. There was plenty of games at the start of the season in which he played the par but his line mates in top 9 were fumbling his passes. He also hit 3 posts in his next 5 games after he returned then was dropped and played with non NHLers like Dube and Duehr.

He had 20 pts in 44 games under that tool last season and his system produced f*** all goals in general.

You wanted to get rid? Fine, boost his value, get a low pick for him.

Absolute nits the pair of them (Hus and Conan)
He’s just not that good. Half of the Wranglers would have put up 9 points in the past calendar year - especially when being force fed PP all year to boot.
 

HighLifeMan

#SnowyStrong
Feb 26, 2009
7,303
2,471
This is nothing like Monahan.

Ok, so you are telling me Monahan wasn't playing on the 4th line with Lucic and Lewis and in a role he was not suited for in which dramatically decreased his value over the last half season here? Monahan had 4 points in 28 games over his last two months playing in a similar situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

joescores

Registered User
Mar 21, 2011
2,169
1,463
He’s just not that good. Half of the Wranglers would have put up 9 points in the past calendar year - especially when being force fed PP all year to boot.
Very clever statement- using PP as some automatic point machine this season. I have probably been watching a dif Calgary team this season where Ruzicka fed that truck from Colorado or that 2nd rounder in Tampa...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

RasmusAndersson

Registered User
Oct 19, 2013
2,457
804
Ruzicka leads all Flames skaters in PP points per 60.

Ya you’re right, we’re really gonna miss him. Great PP and ES numbers. He basically carries our PP. Definitely deserved a bigger role.
 

Attachments

  • 25733FC0-CF83-45E6-9024-A15EABA481F5.png
    25733FC0-CF83-45E6-9024-A15EABA481F5.png
    30.1 KB · Views: 2

Haatley

haatley
Jun 9, 2011
6,999
1,875
Toronto
Ok, so you are telling me Monahan wasn't playing on the 4th line with Lucic and Lewis and in a role he was not suited for in which dramatically decreased his value over the last half season here? Monahan had 4 points in 28 games over his last two months playing in a similar situation.
Sean Monahan was moved there because he was always injured, could barely skate and wasn't producing in the top 2 lines away from Gaudreau.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad