Disagree with this. Not every solid player is a proper fit for what Colorado needs and/or how the Avs like to play the game so their is no point in asking about them.Being in on someone means nothing. The Avs should at the very least ask about every solid player available this deadline.
Once again claiming that Elliotte stole info from him.
This dude f***in sucks.
Oh I was referencing NRD and his weird victim complexI'm glad everyone finally realizes that. Funny that there are still highly paid hockey executives who don't.
He’s quoting Dhaliwal who’s to my understanding the most reliable Canucks reporter out.Who is Taj and who is someone?
Just a fan, but looks like one of those fans that summarises what insiders say on podcasts/radio shows. In this case, he's saying that this is coming from Dhaliwal, who is the Canucks writer for the Atheletic.Who is Taj and who is someone?
Oh I was referencing NRD and his weird victim complex
But I also agree about Risto.
Yah Dhaliwal is reliable when it comes to anything Canucks.He’s quoting Dhaliwal who’s to my understanding the most reliable Canucks reporter out.
I don’t think anyone here is advocating trading Newhook for Miller?
Only issue is that Newhook is the only C prospect(well not prospect anymore really)we have that’s even close to NHL quality. If Miller was signed longer I’d be fine with including him, but I don’t think it’s worth it for a year and a half of Miller.I don't know, I think it is an interesting conversation. Nothing is really gelling well in the bottom 6 and if Newhook had to be the headliner and we could get away with Newhook + JT Compher for JT Miller and Schenn both 50% retained both are signed for more than just a rental and would allow us to keep a lot of the other good assets we have. Not advocating necessarily but wouldn't hate something like that.
Garland would be a very interesting acquisition at the right price. Doesn’t particularly address size in our forwards, but he would be amazing next to Newhook on the third line.
What’s the rumored ask for Garland?
Garland would be a very interesting acquisition at the right price. Doesn’t particularly address size in our forwards, but he would be amazing next to Newhook on the third line.
What’s the rumored ask for Garland?
This would explain why they wanted Stalock
Uhh what’s the issue with Garland?No thanks to Garland, if we waste assets on him I'll fly to Denver and K.O him with a flying helmet myself.