Rumor: 2021-22 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Part VII: Joe is sleepy
- Thread starter forsbergavs32
- Start date
- Status
Disagree with this. Not every solid player is a proper fit for what Colorado needs and/or how the Avs like to play the game so their is no point in asking about them.
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
I'm glad everyone finally realizes that. Funny that there are still highly paid hockey executives who don't.
Avsboy
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 32,243
- 16,657
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
Oh I was referencing NRD and his weird victim complex
But I also agree about Risto.
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
He’s quoting Dhaliwal who’s to my understanding the most reliable Canucks reporter out.
Just a fan, but looks like one of those fans that summarises what insiders say on podcasts/radio shows. In this case, he's saying that this is coming from Dhaliwal, who is the Canucks writer for the Atheletic.
Oh I was referencing NRD and his weird victim complex
But I also agree about Risto.
Oh, gotcha. Yes, that too.
The Kingslayer
Registered User
Yah Dhaliwal is reliable when it comes to anything Canucks.
Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,160
- 37,362
So there’s lots of talk that NJ might be busy at the deadline. I don’t think they’d entertain moving him, but if they would I’d pay a lot to pry Jonas Siegenthaler out of there.
I don't know, I think it is an interesting conversation. Nothing is really gelling well in the bottom 6 and if Newhook had to be the headliner and we could get away with Newhook + JT Compher for JT Miller and Schenn both 50% retained both are signed for more than just a rental and would allow us to keep a lot of the other good assets we have. Not advocating necessarily but wouldn't hate something like that.
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
Only issue is that Newhook is the only C prospect(well not prospect anymore really)we have that’s even close to NHL quality. If Miller was signed longer I’d be fine with including him, but I don’t think it’s worth it for a year and a half of Miller.
Perratrooper
Registered User
Garland would be a very interesting acquisition at the right price. Doesn’t particularly address size in our forwards, but he would be amazing next to Newhook on the third line.
What’s the rumored ask for Garland?
What’s the rumored ask for Garland?
hughdreamz
Registered User
I don’t think there’s a rumored ask. Probably similar to what Giroux and Miller’s price tags are since Garland is on a good contract for 4 more years after this year.
SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
Garland may not be big, but he plays big. He's basically early season LOC with top-6 skills. If the Avs are going to spend big, and sell off significant futures, it would be genius to do that by going after Miller and Garland since they still have time on their contracts. Unless Van's GM is drunk, I don't see that being a legitimate option though.
SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
My wild trade deadline idea is that the Avs acquire Giroux and Provorov in a deal around futures and Girard. Just go bananalands
- Jul 25, 2006
- 31,743
- 22,368
Bill Peckerskull
Fargin' Icehole
Tommy Shelby
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2012
- 7,469
- 4,856
No thanks to Garland, if we waste assets on him I'll fly to Denver and K.O him with a flying helmet myself.
shadow1
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2008
- 16,601
- 5,258
This should be the kiss of death on San Jose's season. They've allowed 155 shots their last four games and were held to 17 shots (or less) for twice in that span (and miraculously won twice thanks to Reimer).
- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,284
- 25,514
- Status
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Game 2 Ontario Reign @ Coachella Valley Firebirds - Coachella Valley Firebirds leads series 1-0Wagers: 3Staked: $425.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Game 6 Dallas Stars @ Colorado Avalanche - Dallas leads series 3-2Wagers: 14Staked: $8,775.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-