Orthodox Caveman
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2006
- 617
- 195
I was thinking about this as well. Both Custance and HSJ have reported on the Red Wings' considerable interest in Zadina and Bouchard. Going back to the last three drafts, there was very little reported connection to Cholowski, Svechnikov, or Rasmussen pre-draft (I recall guys like Rubtsov and Necas being speculated). Is this a case of Detroit simply being less guarded about their internal evaluations because they are drafting higher, or is this information intentionally being provided to the beat writers to drive a desired narrative?They are publicly putting out there some other names through the media in Detroit, but they went out of their way to pump up Necas before drafting Rasmussen last year. The Wings are pretty guarded on their draft board in the run into this process.
I dont normally visit other forums, but since the coach of the team is my guy in the draft, I figured I would ask. Any way hughes gets passed detroit? I am guessing the draft will go dahlin, svechnikov,zadina,tkachuk, and then i can see any combo of bouchard,dobson, wahlstrom, Kotkaniemi,hughes. It scares me blashill is his coach, I thought van had a shot.
From an asset perspective, is the Hughes thing a good plan? I don't mean evaluating the player; that's an excellent idea. But it sure seems to me that the Wings are being pretty transparent about liking Hughes. Blashill giving him ice against good teams, rooming him with Larkin. That's unlike them, as someone has noted. You'd think if the Wings were super high on him, they would try to avoid looking so interested. Especially on such a big stage, where getting playing time and doing even decently is liable to boost your draft stock.
Tinfoil hat: are the Detroit Red Wings trying to get someone else to draft Quinn Hughes? Are the Wings essentially making him look sexy and in demand to get somebody like Ottawa or Arizona to take him, leaving a player Detroit wants still on the board? Considering Detroit is very much into the size-at-all-costs philosophy, it seems at least a little plausible that this is a ruse.
From an asset perspective, is the Hughes thing a good plan? I don't mean evaluating the player; that's an excellent idea. But it sure seems to me that the Wings are being pretty transparent about liking Hughes. Blashill giving him ice against good teams, rooming him with Larkin. That's unlike them, as someone has noted. You'd think if the Wings were super high on him, they would try to avoid looking so interested. Especially on such a big stage, where getting playing time and doing even decently is liable to boost your draft stock.
Tinfoil hat: are the Detroit Red Wings trying to get someone else to draft Quinn Hughes? Are the Wings essentially making him look sexy and in demand to get somebody like Ottawa or Arizona to take him, leaving a player Detroit wants still on the board? Considering Detroit is very much into the size-at-all-costs philosophy, it seems at least a little plausible that this is a ruse.
I'm not saying that's why they named Hughes to the team. But they're definitely paying more attention for that reason, IMO. It's a no-lose: if Hughes succeeds, you win games at the WC, and maybe he's looked good enough that you even want to draft him. If not, someone else does, and that's good. If he's okay, you don't draft him, but someone else does. That's good. If he sucks, you bench him and now you have a reason not to draft him.USA Hockey isn’t sabatoging its own performance at this trounament so Detroit can get some extra scouting looks at a possible draft prospect. The reason Hughes and Larkin are rooming is the Michigan University connection. You’re reading too much into the situation.
I'm not saying that's why they named Hughes to the team. But they're definitely paying more attention for that reason, IMO. It's a no-lose: if Hughes succeeds, you win games at the WC, and maybe he's looked good enough that you even want to draft him. If not, someone else does, and that's good. If he's okay, you don't draft him, but someone else does. That's good. If he sucks, you bench him and now you have a reason not to draft him.
But, you're right. They're rooming because they both attended the prestigious Michigan University.
its a repeat from earlier. They played at the same time as the USA game.Sulak just got annihilated with a knee on knee hit. Might be hurt.
Edit: looks okay on the bench, but he stayed down for a while.
Edit edit: Did this game already happen? I'm confused
No idea why, he looked really good from what I saw when he was on the ice. Not having him on the PP seems really dumb.Hronek played just under 7 minutes that game. Sounds like the coach really believes in him...
Granted, they did run 7 D, but still.
Lol. That’s the total opposite of his scouting report.Hronek needs more time with GR, not good at defense. Sulak should be with Red Wings next year , good at boards , could play against speedy players , not very good offensively though. I would slide him with Joe Hicketts with 3rd pairing
Lol. That’s the total opposite of his scouting report.