I hope someone gets fired if Las Vegas wins the cup this year. Complete non-sense that this has been allowed to happen.
Allowed what to happen? Hope you don't mean the hindsight draft argument; I never understood that one.
The vast majority of posters here laughed at GMGM's draft choices at the time.
I blame GMs more then the system. Glad to see Vegas beating a "real team that we should model ourselves after". For whatever reason it makes me feel a little better about losing lol
First, VGK did their research (hard to fault other teams on that).
Second, some teams had to expose guys they didn't want to loose. To protect that player(s), they had to trade another asset (player, pick) to VGK.
Third, some teams wanted VGK to pick guys specifically (like cap space freedom from guys who will sit out the rest of their contracts on LTIR). VGK was persuaded by acquiring a different asset.
(Sharks did their protection thing by trading away guy/Mueller to another team/NJ so they exposed who they wanted. And IMHO lost one of the guys they signed to expose: Schlemko as the D and Boedker as the F.
Sharks have been pretty good about signing guys to realistic deals. Very small # of buyouts, which will probably increase by one this summer.
And they were set up with zero players with NMCs they had to protect.)
The other thing is, how many of the VGK players, if given the opportunity they had with a new/expanded role and fresh opportunities on their old teams, could have (much less would have) had a career year like they had in Vegas?
And don't discount the synergy of newly formed team coming together and the further catalyst of the tragedy that allowed the team to be the focus of the entire city.
With the looming Seattle expansion potential in two years, I think that many GMs will be carefully looking at expiring contracts and signing new players with that in mind. (Not to mention the potential for the end of the CBA in 2020.)
Given the experience this time around, the GMs may choose to better prepare for the next expansion draft differently.
And if anyone's fired, it may be that the owner had input on the exposed players and is putting the blame on the GM/firee for what they approved.