Gotta think McAdoo could very well be fired by 3 PM tomorrow.
Gotta think McAdoo could very well be fired by 3 PM tomorrow.
He probably should be fired, but they most likely will keep him for the rest of the season. Putting a new coach there could be the sparks that might prevent them from a chance at the first pick in the draft.
He doesn't. He has a number of good athletes. Lots of young guys with promise, but the front office took away pretty much every veteran player the Browns had so their draft picks could play. Some of those picks are going to be great players, but even they are making rookie mistakes. A roster that's half rookies means the rookie mistake excuse is can come up about five times a quarter, which leads to ugly losses.Its not on Hue. He doesn’t have the players
every single giants fan knew that they needed lots of help with the o-line and running game this past offseason. they did not address it at all. that, combined with the D regressing a bit and the irreplaceable injuries to the receivers have led to a perfect storm of suck.Enough, Reese/McAdoo have to go.
It was my understanding from Moneyball that Beane and DePodesta saw the manager as a figurehead and not integral to success. Maybe the same attitude is work here and translating to football.
I will throw the current Browns debacle back in the faces of stat whackers so hard it gives them a black eye.Which doesn't work.
Yeah, there’s a lot of that going on with the old crusty reporters in Celeveland. They see this as proof analytics don’t work (despite the fact teams like the Patriots use a lot of analytics). They also think this proves you need a football guy as GM (despite the fact the Browns have plowed through something like ten football guys as GMs since coming back).I will throw the current Browns debacle back in the faces of stat whackers so hard it gives them a black eye.
Yeah, there’s a lot of that going on with the old crusty reporters in Celeveland. They see this as proof analytics don’t work (despite the fact teams like the Patriots use a lot of analytics). They also think this proves you need a football guy as GM (despite the fact the Browns have plowed through something like ten football guys as GMs since coming back).
Drafting more WRs than they have room for, knocking off early while there's an ongoing trade.Hey, where I'll agree is when these analytics folks the Browns decided they loved their draft picks so much they got rid of every vet to make room for their guys. That was beyond stupid.
every single giants fan knew that they needed lots of help with the o-line and running game this past offseason. they did not address it at all. that, combined with the D regressing a bit and the irreplaceable injuries to the receivers have led to a perfect storm of suck.
Fast forward 2 years later, Reese spends money on defense, McAdoo gets promoted to HC...offense can’t even bust 30 points while the defense is playing lights now.
This year, defense is getting sick and tired of McAdoo’s bull****...offense looks like crap, players revolting/quitting, have not addressed the line backers spots and offensive line is TRASH.
Enough, Reese/McAdoo have to go.
Yeah, there’s a lot of that going on with the old crusty reporters in Celeveland. They see this as proof analytics don’t work (despite the fact teams like the Patriots use a lot of analytics). They also think this proves you need a football guy as GM (despite the fact the Browns have plowed through something like ten football guys as GMs since coming back).
Seahawks and broncos in the off season needed OL help. Just very limited options. Draft wasn't great with OL at the tackle position.
Best OL signing was whitworth from Cincy going to the rams. That's the guy everyone should have targeted. 35 but still good enough for a 1-2 run.
I was surprised that Seattle didn't go all in for him and ultimately settled on joekel.
No point in firing a coach just to promote one of the coordinators.