drax0s
Registered User
Guys, JD Burke has a MEDIA PASS. Not just anyone can get one of those!
It’s a rumour. How in the heck does one refute something that’s, by definition, made up? Do you really think Doug Wilson is so inept to make such an offer?Die on what hill? You're acting like you know better than someone who has a direct source within the organization (JD Burke). So...either reveal your source or come up with something that directly refutes this. You can't.
It’s a rumour. How in the heck does one refute something that’s, by definition, made up? Do you really think Doug Wilson is so inept to make such an offer?
Now that’s too funny. No way Wilson made such a clearly stupid offer.Guys, JD Burke has a MEDIA PASS. Not just anyone can get one of those!
I could see Miller as part of a deal for nine, but not the main part.We don't even know what the offer was. It could have been Miller and Boeser for the nine. Who knows.
Cool story.We didn't trade Vanek for picks because we want to make a hockey trade. We didn't shop any other veterans. We are not interested in trading tanev.
We are not rebuilding. We have Boeser and Petterson. The rebuild is complete. We successfully completed a rebuild while successfully avoiding one, it's like success squared.
Guys Jim Benning is doing a great job! Just ignore 96% of his moves guys! Patience!Guys, JD Burke has a MEDIA PASS. Not just anyone can get one of those!
This 'past year' is the key there,a few things have transpired since then...and yes,they traded a 4th round pick..Yet they were going all in for the playoffs last season.?Oldest team in the league this past year based on the average age of every team's top 10 scorers. They traded away a draft pick and prospect this year too. Yet they're rebuilding?
Wrong.
Look at a team like the Rangers. THEY are rebuilding. The Canucks most certainly are not in a rebuild. They're just existing.
Good red herring post!Guys Jim Benning is doing a great job! Just ignore 96% of his moves guys! Patience!
This 'past year' is the key there,a few things have transpired since then...and yes,they traded a 4th round pick..Yet they were going all in for the playoffs last season.?
The Loui signing was summer 2016. The Burrows and Hansen trades were TDL 2017. Rebuild began at that point. Or at least a JB rebuild.Jim Benning committed over 70 million dollars, to Loui Eriksson, and Brandon Sutter.
He did that to rebuild, obviously.
Trevor Linden did say it would be unfair to have a tear down rebuild while the Twins were still here. I wonder if the Twins retiring when they did had anything to do with TL and JB telling them the team is rebuilding with youth?Well to be fair it’s only changing because a pair of guys decided to retire. Hardly seems to be a function of management’s decisions.
The difference here is that your comment is an entirely made up strawman!Guys Jim Benning is doing a great job! Just ignore 96% of his moves guys! Patience!
This 'past year' is the key there,a few things have transpired since then...and yes,they traded a 4th round pick..Yet they were going all in for the playoffs last season.?
It’s a rumour. How in the heck does one refute something that’s, by definition, made up? Do you really think Doug Wilson is so inept to make such an offer?
" As a quick example, what is Vancouver doing that a Pittsburgh isn't (other than winning?). Nothing. If Vancouver is rebuilding, then the Penguins are rebuilding too. If the Penguins aren't rebuilding, neither is Vancouver."..Your quote.No, of course they didn't go "all in" for the playoffs... of course, they also didn't go "all in" for the future. They balanced it... like all legit "bubble teams" challenging for a playoff spot do. The Canucks are operating like a bubble team... that just happens to have floated far, far away to the bottom of a big o'l ditch. Cup contenders are more inclined to go "all in" for the playoffs.
I will speak to you though, when a 1st is traded for a roster-now piece. How many more years (and therefore, 1st round picks) are left in this rebuild? 2 mor years? 5 more? 10 more? 25 more?
" As a quick example, what is Vancouver doing that a Pittsburgh isn't (other than winning?). Nothing. If Vancouver is rebuilding, then the Penguins are rebuilding too. If the Penguins aren't rebuilding, neither is Vancouver."..Your quote.
So were not operating like the Penguins now,we're operating like a 'bubble team'..?
The difference here is that your comment is an entirely made up strawman!
So... Why was the response to me? That'd be like me responding to something you said with "Yeah, but Gaudette will be our 1C!" because M2B said it somewhere. The two things are not connected.No it isn't. Connor mcHindu, nucksrule and royal dude have all said this in earnestness.
So... Why was the response to me? That'd be like me responding to something you said with "Yeah, but Gaudette will be our 1C!" because M2B said it somewhere. The two things are not connected.
The Canucks operate each season to be 'competitive'...At no time before, or during last season did JB say the Canucks 'are' a playoff team..Last season was all about being competitive...What else are you going to say to the ticket buying public?..They were gunning for the playoffs from 2015-17 (which we both agree was dumb),but not last year.The Canucks operate each offseason like they are gunning for the playoffs... then they are forced to change mid-season when reality hits them in the face... whereas Pittsburgh has a much firmer grasp on reality, throughout.
if Benning's team was actually looking like a playoff team come trade deadline, the types of moves a Pittsburgh or Benning's Canucks make would be virtually identical... as a legit cup contender, Pittsburgh's first might be traded earlier in the season. As a bottom feeder, Benning's 1st is more valuable come trade deadline time. As trade deadline approaches, that usually signals the start of the "rebuilding" phase of the season... due to the standings. Worst place team spending the 1st on a playoff rental? My thoughts on Benning are very low... but I do give him more credit than that. However, like a Pittsburgh (or another playoff gunning team) absolutely, a Benning 1st, 2nd, or 3rd rounder is not safe from trade.
Rebuilding team... they operate more like Pittsburgh than they do a bottom feeder.
Even the Pittsburgh's of the NHL make futures moves. For example, they determined that puiliot didn't have what it takes, and recycled him for a pick. They are a lot closer, in strategy, then far apart.
"Re-building" should be reserved for a team with a strategy towards the future. What the Canucks are doing is delaying and holding back achievement and progress... or in other words, "re-tarding" . Benning is "re-tarding" the Canucks. We are not in the middle of a "Re-building" ... we are in the middle of a "re-tarding" .