- Feb 24, 2012
- 62,749
- 46,740
Did Dorion really hold a surprise presser to say "Absolutely nothing is happening"? That's an odd move to say the least.
Go on...
Purposely hire a guy as an interim measure because, hey, aren't they all interim measures? Sorry, I meant to say this is insanely horrible logic.
That's akin to settling for the Ford Pinto with the leaky gas tank because, hey, don't all cars break down after a time?
You're looking for a quick-fix guy for a team clearly building for long term. They should be looking for the guy who makes them a winner now and in the future, not some guy who's gonna take them to maybe one playoff run and then get tuned out. Not to mention he fits the scope of this team even less than he does Ottawa's.
I think of you as one of the more knowledegable posters on here, but I've never disagreed with you more.
Unless you are getting a Cooper/Babcock/Q/Laviolette sort of coach, they are all disposable. Get ones that can help your team get to the next level and work up the chain until the team is desireable enough to attract one of the top end coaches because until the Avs are a playoff level young team with upside, they won't attract the high end coaches. Find a coach to get them to that level and one that has a proven record to get there. Boucher could do that, and do it quickly. He wouldn't be my top choice (of coaches who may get canned, AV would be my absolute top choice), but I'd take him in a heartbeat.
Number of coaches that started 13-14 with their current club: 3 (Q, Cooper, AV)
14-15: 7 (3 above plus Maurice, Laviolette, Trotz, and Peters)
The other 24 clubs in the NHL all haven't made it 3 seasons yet. Hakstol, McLellan, Babcock, Deboer, Hynes, and Blashill are the group that started 15-16. Babcock is definitely safe. Hynes likely is... beyond those two, I could see all the others being canned. Coaches don't last 3 seasons in the NHL unless they are elite. Find a coach to advance the team to the next level, and make the job more attractive. At the stage the Avs are at, attracting a coach who will be good enough for 5 years is a fool's errand.
Boucher isn’t a grinder coach, he is a great coach who just loses his room early. Today’s Mike Keenan. Boucher gets this team to a level where you enter the conversation for the 5-10 level coaches.
Treating a coach like Sacco is giving a crappy coach 4 seasons... that might be what we are going through with Bednar. Maybe exactly...
AV would be my top realistic choice by a mile. We have a roster that fits him too. I’d be surprised if he lasted past 3 years too late though.
Decent is the word I would use. Not bad, not good, decent. Certainly not good enough to make up for his mental lapses and softness.On a side note, I keep hearing Holden is a decent skater but man, I remember him getting burned multiple times and looking like a drunken turtle trying to hustle back. Am I wrong about his skating? I get he's not Nate Guenin out there but I didn't think he was fast either.
Speaking of the Sens, I was thinking about uniform designs and how at least most of them are good or at least acceptable, with only a few really awful ones out there.
So an impromptu ranking, since no one asked.
GREAT: CHI, STL, DAL, PHI, MON, NYR, NYI
GOOD: BUF, BOS, DET, COL, CBJ, TOR, PIT, TB
OK: EDM, FLA, MIN, NJ, NSH, SJ, WSH, CAR, VAN, VGK
UGH: CGY, LA, AZ, ANA, OTT, WPG
Personally I'd have Avs, Pittsburgh and Edmonton in the great category, and Minny + LA in the good category.
It's going to take the rest of the league a while to catch up to MacKinnon breaking out. Most people still think he's a bust.Wow. Some Florida fans feeling a bit insecure when the topic is Barkov vs MacKinnon http://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/mackinnon-vs-barkov.2422169/