If he's more of a playmaker than a scorer, wouldn't it make sense to put him on a line with guys that have scoring ability? To me, J. Staal and Ruutu are more crash and bang players that make space for others, score goals close in, and while they can score, they aren't overly skilled scorers. Early on, JStaal seemed to have good chemistry with Skinner and I remember Muller even talking about it. He said Skinner was feeding off of the space Jordan was creating and could read the play well and cash in on it. It seemed to fall apart later in the season.
I guess you can never tell until people get put together (few of us would have predicted Tlusty would be a match for E. Staal either). I'd still like to see them try another big (or at least physical), defensively responsible forward on that line with Staal and Ruutu. They could then be the defensive shut-down line AND be a line that wears other teams down and can still score. Maybe make the 3rd line a scoring line that goes up against the other team's weaker competition.
You've hit on yet another stalwart of the Rutherford Era that makes me crazy, the "slotting" of players. Tossing around line combinations is fine for message board crazies like ourselves, but as far as the actual lineup goes, it should be determined by the players by how they work together in training camp and practices. But JR likes to have all this stuff figured out, then jam it down everybody's collective throat. The GMs job is to sign guys and get them to camp, after that, it's up to the coach and players to determine lines and ice time. I've never seen a GM more concerned with how a player "fits" before he even puts on the practice jersey for the first time.
As for the No. 5 pick, with all the recent misdirection and misinformation, it seems that just about everyone is in play at No. 5. With that in mind, I hope we do what it takes to get the guy we want. All these picks are in play. It seems to me to be very similar to 2003, when each of the teams at the top had a different target. Instead of letting the other teams jockey and taking BAP at our spot, I hope we actually do the jockeying necessary to get the guy we want. I have no idea who our guy is in the Top 5 (although I'd assume Jones is attractive), I just hope we do something to actually get him.
Here's what I think will happen: I think Colorado is getting ready to school the entire NHL on how to use the draft to rebuild (I hope JR is taking notes).
MacKinnon goes No. 1 to Florida. I think Florida and Colorado will flip-flop at the top. Florida really needs the No. 1 center MacKinnon as opposed to Drouin, Jones or anyone in the second tier. The Avs will benefit from their flexibility (I think they'd be fine with any of MacKinnon, Drouin, Barkov or Jones) to pick up an extra pick or a mid-level roster guy, but not a windfall.
Barkov goes No. 2 to Nashville. Then I think the Avs will tweak Yzerman in Tampa Bay and Poile in Nashville, who both pretty obviously covet Barkov, and maybe even get another asset or two. If they can't, they take Jones at No. 2, but I think he'll get one of them to bite. I'll guess Poile, only because he has more depth to deal from.
Drouin goes No. 3 to Tampa Bay.
Jones goes No. 4 to Colorado.
________
IMO, if Carolina wants Jones or Drouin, as opposed to "who's left after the top 4 go," they should be in contact with Steve Yzerman. With MacKinnon and Barkov off the board, I think Tampa Bay would prefer Drouin, but could live with Nichushkin, who pretty clearly falls to No. 5 or below in this scenario. So we could actually sneak into the picture with Jones if we're willing to move up two spots.
As I said, I don't think this is going to happen, and I think we'll take Lindholm at No. 5 after the big 4 go as planned. But if we did make a deal to get to No. 3, we'd do it to get Jones and the rest of the top 5 would look like:
Jones goes No. 3 to Carolina.
Drouin goes No. 4 to Colorado (spectacular draft, move back *twice* and still get Drouin).
Nichushkin goes No. 5 to Tampa Bay.
In short, Carolina needs to be ready to act if Jones gets past No. 2.