BenedictGomez
Corsi is GROSSLY overrated
I would pay $10 for a Taormina jersey. Or a Murphy. Loved those guys for no reason lol
Meigray has game used authentics of both, but for a bit more than $10. I think $250.
I would pay $10 for a Taormina jersey. Or a Murphy. Loved those guys for no reason lol
I love those guys but i am not willing to pay that muchMeigray has game used authentics of both, but for a bit more than $10. I think $250.
Hayes is just posting up in front of the net on the PP. He's a big body. Not that Hayes is any good at it, Bratt is not going to play that role.I might be alone here, but I think Bratt is misused/under-appreciated by the coach.
Why is he playing on the 4th line?
Why is friggen Hayes playing over him on the PP?
There's always some great finds on there for a laugh. I'm sure some here would love to get their hands on a Yohann Auvitu stick or jersey.Meigray has game used authentics of both, but for a bit more than $10. I think $250.
Hayes is just posting up in front of the net on the PP. He's a big body. Not that Hayes is any good at it, Bratt is not going to play that role.
But I agree on getting Bratt more love overall.
Hayes is just posting up in front of the net on the PP. He's a big body. Not that Hayes is any good at it, Bratt is not going to play that role.
But I agree on getting Bratt more love overall.
Since Bratt was moved down in the lines he hasn't scored any points. This proves 2 things.
1) That you are dependent on your linemates aka its a team game
2) If given the right company he can produce at NHL level
The question is why he isn´t allowed to play where he can succeed? I would guess that he could do a lot of damage with Mojo and perhaps someone else could play a better 3rd line game than Bratt. Anyway, its a pity they couldnt keep him in the top 6 until he stopped producing. The guy was sporting 1+ ppg... demotion shouldn't have been the response. Thats just my opinion but i can be wrong.
I understand wanting to manage his minutes and not overtax a young player, but Bratt's usage has confused me more than anything Hynes has done this year. Bratt is 23rd in the league among all forwards (1st among rookies) in the league for short handed ice time per game right now. Hynes clearly trusts him to play difficult minutes, but he's only averaging 9:24 per game of even strength time, which is last on the team.Since Bratt was moved down in the lines he hasn't scored any points. This proves 2 things.
1) That you are dependent on your linemates aka its a team game
2) If given the right company he can produce at NHL level
The question is why he isn´t allowed to play where he can succeed? I would guess that he could do a lot of damage with Mojo and perhaps someone else could play a better 3rd line game than Bratt. Anyway, its a pity they couldnt keep him in the top 6 until he stopped producing. The guy was sporting 1+ ppg... demotion shouldn't have been the response. Thats just my opinion but i can be wrong.
I understand wanting to manage his minutes and not overtax a young player, but Bratt's usage has confused me more than anything Hynes has done this year. Bratt is 23rd in the league among all forwards (1st among rookies) in the league for short handed ice time per game right now. Hynes clearly trusts him to play difficult minutes, but he's only averaging 9:24 per game of even strength time, which is last on the team.
Hynes clearly trusts him to play difficult minutes, but he's only averaging 9:24 per game of even strength time, which is last on the team.
Agreed that the amount of special teams is really messing with our lines. In a game where there are a lot of power plays though, I'd like to see him get some power play time over a scrub like Hayes or over someone who isn't playing well if he is. I loved what Hynes did in the Rags game by benching guys because in the past he hasn't been very quick to make adjustments in game, but he needs to do it more.And that includes the one game where he was one of the nine forwards who did play in the last two periods.
It is true with Stafford playing well someone (either he or Bratt) had to be dropped from the top six. I do think the Zacha-Bratt line could get more time at even strength than they do though it seems like we're spending an inordinate amount of time on special teams and that's screwing around with the line allocation a bit too when everyone's in the lineup (Stafford missed three games, Palm one and MarJo/Zacha were benched for most of one but they're all in the top six now).
Agreed that the amount of special teams is really messing with our lines. In a game where there are a lot of power plays though, I'd like to see him get some power play time over a scrub like Hayes or over someone who isn't playing well if he is. I loved what Hynes did in the Rags game by benching guys because in the past he hasn't been very quick to make adjustments in game, but he needs to do it more.
No one with a good power play puts a 4th liner in front of the net.Well the only reason Hayes gets a spot on the PP is the whole big body in front role that the fourth forward generally fills. Sure on merit Bratt would be one of the top eight PP forwards and he does get 'some' time on it (nearly three minutes per game) but they already have a lot of perimeter players on the PP.
No one with a good power play puts a 4th liner in front of the net.
Oh for sure our power play is good, but I don't think Hayes has contributed much of anything. Teams with the big guy in front approach are using big and skilled guys that play in their top 6 so they can clean up the trash that drops in front. Hayes has done some screening, but he's useless with the puck and useless on zone entries.We actually do have a good one. I think this is more a mistake of player usage.
I see your point but perhaps they should try to play with a offensive top 9, pair up offensive players who has chemistry and try to find a 3rd guy who can fit into it. That would maximize the production with what you got.Because there isn’t an open top 6 spot right now.
The problem is more the ice time then the linemates. The Zacha line isn’t getting a lot of minutes at evens and it is limiting all their chances.
I see your point but perhaps they should try to play with a offensive top 9, pair up offensive players who has chemistry and try to find a 3rd guy who can fit into it. That would maximize the production with what you got.
Anyway, i dont know the team well enough to suggest anything real. Ive seen a few devil games this year and enjoyed them (for the first time). Hope the team will continue playing the same. Still find it odd to take Bratt out of the top 6 when he was producing the way he was. Are Devils scoring more goals and playing better offence now than the first 3 games?
But Santini never looked as good as Bratt looks.They did this with Santini last year. Despite how he looked they limited his minutes in an attempt to protect him. The
I would pay $10 for a Taormina jersey. Or a Murphy. Loved those guys for no reason lol
It doesn't seem like Bratt has a ton of chemistry with Nico where as Stafford does. Bratt also isn't supplanting Palmieri if he's in the lineup so third line is the most logical choice.Since Bratt was moved down in the lines he hasn't scored any points. This proves 2 things.
1) That you are dependent on your linemates aka its a team game
2) If given the right company he can produce at NHL level
The question is why he isn´t allowed to play where he can succeed? I would guess that he could do a lot of damage with Mojo and perhaps someone else could play a better 3rd line game than Bratt. Anyway, its a pity they couldnt keep him in the top 6 until he stopped producing. The guy was sporting 1+ ppg... demotion shouldn't have been the response. Thats just my opinion but i can be wrong.