by far ? they are all pretty similar in up-side, bigger ceiling to Caufield but also bigger floorZegras by far.
by far ? they are all pretty similar in up-side, bigger ceiling to Caufield but also bigger floor
an other hot take by the Avalanche.
Definitely, you are an Habs fan.I represent the entire Avalanche? Cool.
And again, I’m a Habs fan.
Definitely, you are an Habs fan.
Smaller more explosive less strong BackstromCan someone describe Zegras?
Zegras, then Boldy, then Caufield. The Caufield hype has gotten out of control. Zegras and Boldy have just as high a ceiling and are more likely to hit it. Caufield’s only NHL caliber quality thus far is his shot, everything else is going to take a lot of work. He’s like Laine but almost a foot shorter.
Smaller more explosive less strong Backstrom
I have been using Barzal as comp. Playmaker, good with puck, patient, sees ice extremely well. Has many speeds - can quicken it up or slow it down very well.Can someone describe Zegras?
Thats just wrong... It's like saying boldy's only NHL quality is his size or Zegras' only quality is his playmaking, Almost every draft ranking prior to the draft had Caufield ahead of Boldy including Button, Pronman, Mckenzie or neck and neck (McKeens). Also don't know why bring up Laine, absolutely no one takes Boldy and possibly Zegras over him, even after his bad year.
Boldy and Zegras both have far more complete games than Caufield and both have more qualities that are better than Caufield. Caufield racked up a bunch of goals because he got to open space and let his historically great team do the rest. Laine is a stylistic comparison. Caufield will not be as good an NHL player as Boldy or Zegras unless he takes massive strides in figuring out how to play hockey and not just how to shoot a puck. And clearly, teams would take Boldy and Zegras over Caufield.