RedHawkDown
still trying to trust the yzerplan
This is absolutely true when there’s only a few good players, or one or two star players. It is never true when a team truly has (supposedly) 4+ 1st liners and 2-3 top pairing D, along with a good #4 (Zub). No team that actually has those players has been nearly as bad as ottawa. If you can name a single team in the last decade, I’ll back off.I dunno. I've seen a lot of shitty teams over the years with all star players on them. Zero team cohesion, but still a clearly skilled or talented player thats getting their cookies.
Heck, we've seen Edmonton struggle at times with 2 of the best players in the world.
It happens.
Yes, because beyond mcdavid and drai, there was literally nobody. No top pairing D, barely any top 6 D at all, no good 2nd liners, and essentially AHL quality players on the rest of the roster. Karlsson, again a good example - beyond him, the team had maybe 1 first liner in Hertl, and then no other good top 6 forwards, and definitely no other top 4 D.Actually, yes. Edmonton finished second last one year with McDavid and draisaitl.
Those rangers teams I mentioned also finished 6th last twice.
That's my point.
This isn't uncommon.
Didn't Karlsson win the Norris on the worst team last year?
Plenty of stars have played on bottom teams. Doesn't make those stars less good. It just means the collection of 23 players is not good.
The difference is that Ottawa fans claim they have MULTIPLE of each of those things. If yall said - Sanderson is a top pairing D and Stutzle is an elite 1C, but beyond that we have no other good top6F/top4D - then that would make sense, and the record would make sense. As it is, the claims are absurd
When Detroit finished 4th last in 2019, for example , we had 1 first line player (Larkin). We had 3 other very average 2nd liners (athanasiou, mantha, nyquist). We had 1 true #4D in the corpse of Kronwall. Hrinek was a 4/5, and the rest of the D were dog shit 6/7/AHL tier. So the record makes sense.
Last edited: