Let's be honest. We're all disappointed he couldn't score a goal while up here. 1 goal in 16 career NHL games
Gustav Nyquist had 1+6=7 points after his first 18 NHL games.
And he was 2 years older than Zadina on those times. In a better team, a contender. We saw the EXPLOSION on later years.
Disappointed yeah, but people in here could still be expecting too much from Zadina.
***
Another example, Tomas Tatar had 1 goal in his first 9 NHL games. No assists. He debuted on same age, few months older than Zadina is now.
Zadina also has had 23+25=48 points in 79 AHL games. That's 0.61 point per game.
Tatar had 16+16=32 points after 58 games (0.55 point per game) on his AHL rookie season (2nd year pro, had 1 pro year at Slovakia)
Zadina, AHL-rookie, 59 games, 16+19=35 pts
Tatar, AHL-rookie, 58 games, 16+16=32 pts
They were almost identical aged on those seasons.
Imo, Zadina is a bit head of the development curve of Tatar, and definitely ahead of Nyquist.
I expect him to be a Tatar/Nyquist typed of modern hybrid in his prime. Never proably our 1st line RW, because that's Mantha. But great 2nd line RW.
I don't know what others are expecting? Maybe too much because of the pick height?
I understand that people are desperate to see these kids in NHL, because the team sucks. But they have to developed in a lower league and let them DOMINATE the lower league, before promoted.
Don't need overripening or anything like that, but you just need to be NHL-ready. Zadina has now gotten the taste. He knows something about the game pace, how to develop himself, what was good, what was bad. When he will concentrate on those things, next season will be his real NHL rookie season.
At next season I would be first time concerned, if he is getting nothing done.