DarkSaturn
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 540
- 33
In the present season we already have a negative goal differential of -12, it's super early in the season, but my line in the sand is if our team hits -20 in goal differential at any point prior to the 20 game mark I'd pull the plug on Eakins. My goal for Eakins season to show improvement would be a year to year goal differential improvement of +35.
I understand MacTavish firing Krueger to an extent in that +12 improvement could be written off as just standing still and that was the natural improvement of our young guys creating that small boost, but Tambellini firing Renney after showing that much improvement .
Also worth remembering that the Krueger shortened year also featured game after game against western conference teams. If you compare only results vs. the west, his time here looks even better.
It wasn't great to watch, getting outshot night after night. Faceoff percentage played a role in that, but it was also the system. But clearly it's better to have 40 shots against in which only 10 of them are quality chances, vs the current system that gives up 30 shots again, but 20 of them are quality chances.
The current aggressive pinch thing is just as bad as the swarm, every turnover in the offensive zone leads to an odd-man rush, and every turnover in the neutral zone leads to an open man in the slot. Almost as though there is a reason that good teams that employ pinching defensemen pair them with stay at home types...