BoredBrandonPridham
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2011
- 7,573
- 4,061
Is that the first time in the Matthews era we have seen family and Leafs in the same sentence? Good sign.
Nah
Is that the first time in the Matthews era we have seen family and Leafs in the same sentence? Good sign.
D minutes tonight:
- Rielly 20:49
- Holl 20:22
- Muzzin 19:55
- Brodie 19:30
- Sandin 18:00
- Dermott 16:52
Keefe definitely trusts that third pairing; Sandin with solid PP time & Dermott with solid PK time as well.
How did Foligno do?
Engvall can still be useful. I think if we face Edmonton. We can put Engvall for a good chunk of the game just to shadow McDavid and be decently effective.Anyone miss Pierre , Vesey and Boyd ?
If Vancouver wins out, that means they’d defeat Winnipeg and the Oilers along the way. Then in order for the Oilers and Jets to stay above Toronto they’d need to win games, however some of their games are against each other meaning that one of them wouldn’t get the necessary points to take over Toronto. Puts impossible for Vancouver to win out AND for us to finish with less points than the Jets or Oilers.i dont understand how we clinched
vancouver can still win out and hold tiebreaker
And bogo!Leafs are looking good in the Folligno era and we still have Hyman coming back.
Kerfoot looks a little Rustyused to be our 4th line with Pierre as our centre
View attachment 427491
We clinched because it's mathematically impossible for all 4 of Montreal, Edmonton, Vancouver and Winnipeg to pass us. You need to consider the games played amongst themselves.i dont understand how we clinched
vancouver can still win out and hold tiebreaker
Engvall can still be useful. I think if we face Edmonton. We can put Engvall for a good chunk of the game just to shadow McDavid and be decently effective.
You are kidding right ?Engvall can still be useful. I think if we face Edmonton. We can put Engvall for a good chunk of the game just to shadow McDavid and be decently effective.
Good oneKerfoot looks a little Rusty
Could be a excellent 4th linerAdam Brooks looks like an NHL player.
I'm a big fan of his -- particularly for his stellar junior career -- and have been hopeful but undecided about his future in the NHL.
I'm still undecided, but much more hopeful than before.
I would be very pleased if he becomes a regular.
He was so good I jumped for joyHow did Foligno do?
Brooks is really good. I don't think Engvall is better then Brooks. I just think Engvall can be useful in some scenarios is all.You are kidding right ?
Anyway , much to elated to start anything up , regarding the possibility of Pierre being even a iota better than Brooks or anybody on our team
All kidding as side and again this is not against this man personally
He absolutely is one of the all time worse players to ever be fortunate enough to pull on a leaf Jersey
Good one
I was waiting for this lol
How about the giant ?
and probably the reason the team did just enough to control the game and come out with the Wthe only thing I will say is they are missing gallagher, tatar, drouin and price which should boost the habs a lot if they get them all back for the playoffs. Good win boys
Only scenario Pierre would be useful is when he gets picked up by The KrakenBrooks is really good. I don't think Engvall is better then Brooks. I just think Engvall can be useful in some scenarios is all.