LeafsNation75
Registered User
Forgive me for brining up Nazem Kadri but I feel it's appropriate since I have seen many comments about him saying the Leafs would be better if Kyle Dubas never traded him for Tyson Barrie.
Anyway this is what I'm wondering. I have seen comments on here saying if Kadri wasn't suspended last year most likely the Leafs win that series. However if we go back to the 2018 playoffs against Boston let's remember Kadri was suspended after Game 1 and missed Games 2, 3, & 4. By that time Toronto was down 3-1 in the series and Kadri returned for Game 5 that they won and they won Game 6, which forced a Game 7 and we know they lost with him in the lineup.
So knowing all of that why would last year have been any different if Kadri was never suspended for a second year in a row during the playoffs? In both 2018 and 2019 Toronto was in position to eliminate Boston and failed both years. The only difference is 2018 was in a Game 7 with Kadri in the lineup, where as in 2019 they were up 3-2 and still lost with him out of the lineup and despite having two chances to eliminate the Bruins.
Anyway this is what I'm wondering. I have seen comments on here saying if Kadri wasn't suspended last year most likely the Leafs win that series. However if we go back to the 2018 playoffs against Boston let's remember Kadri was suspended after Game 1 and missed Games 2, 3, & 4. By that time Toronto was down 3-1 in the series and Kadri returned for Game 5 that they won and they won Game 6, which forced a Game 7 and we know they lost with him in the lineup.
So knowing all of that why would last year have been any different if Kadri was never suspended for a second year in a row during the playoffs? In both 2018 and 2019 Toronto was in position to eliminate Boston and failed both years. The only difference is 2018 was in a Game 7 with Kadri in the lineup, where as in 2019 they were up 3-2 and still lost with him out of the lineup and despite having two chances to eliminate the Bruins.