trentmccleary
Registered User
I'd easily, EASILY, take Rielly over Ceci, no questions asked.
Ceci is great, better than I thought he'd be (I wasn't high on him when drafted, and the season after he was drafted), but Rielly is going to be a #1 D in this league for a long time.
I have doubts about Rielly being a #1 because I don't see him having an elite dimension.
I'm using special teams as a proxy because they tend to indicate utility for all game situations. Basically, they indicate versatility and that leads to ES ice time too.
A #1 has an elite dimension, if not two. As a proxy, I'll say the dominant player on one special team and at least solid on the other. That obviously won't be Ceci.
Bottom pairing guys are one-dimensional bubble players who fill out 1 spot on one of the 2nd units (thinking Campoli-Carkner here). Ceci is better than this now.
A #4 is typically a strong one-dimensional player who'll get significant time on one special team. Methot and Phillips occasionally got significant PP minutes and had offensive partners... Ceci just bested their career seasons with virtually no PP time and weak partners.
#2-3 is where the minute eating two-way guys are usually slotted. I think this is where Ceci ends up because he's shown enough all round ability to eventually eat minutes and be used in all situations. I also think that Rielly will ultimately wind up in the #2 range instead of #1.
My main opinion based on how close their careers have been so far, despite Rielly getting much more opportunity, is that I doubt they'll be any more than one slot apart on a hypothetical average teams depth chart. Most likely #2 for Rielly and #3 for Ceci.