With the Trade Deadline slowly approaching...
- Thread starter CBJx614
- Start date
- Status
Johansen2Foligno
CBJ Realest
- Jan 2, 2015
- 9,253
- 4,174
This is obviously a joke to me, but please use the "" for joke proposals.
The 'joke' proposal would have included Wisniewski instead of Murray
We Want Ten
Make Chinakov Great Again
Robert
Foligno family
Rope burns reminded me of the rope tows in WNY ski country back in the 60's...
I was a very good skier back then, ski resorts used ropes to pull people up the hill.... it caused rope burns...
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
It's being reported by The Score that OEL of Arizona is available. What would you all give up for OEL? He's a top 15 Dman in this league for sure, 23 years old. 5.5 cap hit til 2019. Much younger than Wiz, essentially the same cost but locked up for longer, can fill his role and some more. Main difference here is Wiz is a RHD and OEL is LHD.
Wiz+CBJ 2015 1st++?
Wiz+CBJ 2015 1st++?
There is nothing realistic we would give up. It would have to be something like Murray + 2015 1st at a minimum, and they would probably still say no. Probably something more like Murray + Wennberg + 2015 1st to get them to consider.
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
If it came to them wanting Murray then I'd pass, but 2015 1st and our other prospects would still all be on the table, plus a majority of our roster players.
I would pretty easily offer JMFJ/Wiz + 2015 1st + Wennberg and maybe more at the draft for OEL
Last edited:
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
I also think based upon the success between OEL/Yandle and Wiz's recent improvement in his own zone that if we were able to trade for OEL and retain Wiz that an OEL/Wiz top D pairing and PP unit would be very, VERY effective. Murray-Savard would fit nicely on the 2nd pairing.
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
you say it's a joke, but probably exactly what they need if they want to get Auston Matthews in 2016
For the love of Gordie Howe, give them Murray for OEL. Murray is not some kind of irreplaceable god. Certainly for OEL Murray should be on the table, at least for discussion purposes.
Now I'm starting to get uncomfortable. I'd be willing to go with a 2015 2nd and a different prospect.
Cyclones Rock
Registered User
- Jun 12, 2008
- 10,597
- 6,523
Hello Johnny
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2007
- 13,208
- 1,142
I would be ok with dealing Murray in this scenario. He and OEL are cut from the same cloth, but Arizona, as others have pointed out, would want more than just Murray. And rightfully so. However, I don't think both the 2015 first AND Wennberg would need to be dealt, but one of them would, with probably another piece or two on top.
If it was just Murray and the first, I'm in. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and I think value wise that's at least palatable for Arizona. But they have no need to trade him unless they're blown away, which this package doesn't do. The extra piece or two they'd want would be too rich for me. This season is lost; just let Murray et al heal and gear up for next year. As great as it would be to have OEL, he doesn't turn this season around for us.
If it was just Murray and the first, I'm in. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and I think value wise that's at least palatable for Arizona. But they have no need to trade him unless they're blown away, which this package doesn't do. The extra piece or two they'd want would be too rich for me. This season is lost; just let Murray et al heal and gear up for next year. As great as it would be to have OEL, he doesn't turn this season around for us.
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
if you're of the opinion that Murray is going to be injury plagued, why would he hold value to the Coyotes or any other team?
if you're of the opinion that Murray isn't going to be injury plagued, why would you even entertain the idea of trading him?
makes no sense to me
if you're of the opinion that Murray isn't going to be injury plagued, why would you even entertain the idea of trading him?
makes no sense to me
If you're of the opinion he might be injury plagued, but the other team is not (or is willing to roll the dice).
Hello Johnny
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2007
- 13,208
- 1,142
Because OEL already is what we expect Murray's ceiling to be. There aren't many OELs though, so this is a special exception for the availability of Ryan. Kind of like fast-forwarding to the (almost) finished product, if that makes sense.
niflheim
Hockey is cheating
- Nov 22, 2014
- 1,140
- 37
This f.. sleep deprivation makes me mad.. Are You ready to trade our three 1st rounders for OEL?
Why? I guess we finish 24 -25.. If we needn't Crouse or Zacha we can trade our 1st for Werenski or Kylington + 2st rounder. We ll have 3 2st + 3 3st, not bad for our depth in future and Keka can sleep well without troubles I am completely sure that Werenski or Kylington will be fine D.
Why? I guess we finish 24 -25.. If we needn't Crouse or Zacha we can trade our 1st for Werenski or Kylington + 2st rounder. We ll have 3 2st + 3 3st, not bad for our depth in future and Keka can sleep well without troubles
I am completely sure that Werenski or Kylington will be fine D.
This f.. sleep deprivation makes me mad.. Are You ready to trade our three 1st rounders for OEL?
Why? I guess we finish 24 -25.. If we needn't Crouse or Zacha we can trade our 1st for Werenski or Kylington + 2st rounder. We ll have 3 2st + 3 3st, not bad for our depth in future and Keka can sleep well without troubles
Who said they were in favor of that? Dreaming of straw men?
Johansen2Foligno
CBJ Realest
- Jan 2, 2015
- 9,253
- 4,174
I guess you could say fast forward his development to...ludicrous speed.
YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
- Status
