DKH
The Bergeron of HF
- Feb 27, 2002
- 74,580
- 53,100
My gut tells me this is a great pick
As opposed to blind outrage?You can't even criticize the Bruins for drafting a 7th rounder with their only top 100 pick in the draft. I mean come on. Like I said blind faith, must be nice.
sadly yes, but of course it's from other people that get paid to do these things.
With all due respect to you and the sites who rank guys how many times to they actually watch a prospects full game, who isn't ranked in the first few rounds? How many times do they talk to prospects to find out info like their work ethic, character, etc? Do they know if he recently had a growth spurt that could maybe affect their development?It's the constant reaching and trying to be smarter than everybody that i hate from Sweeney, Senyshen was just the perfect example. I know whoever they took here is a longshot to make the NHL but try to maximize your chances by not acting like an arrogant p**** and going so far off the board.
My gut tells me it's time for lunchMy gut tells me this is a great pick
But Clownfart.Penis has him ranked 176th! Bad pick!Just fire all the scouts who have decades of scouting knowledge and go by pre-draft lists when drafting. Am I doing this right?
It's the constant reaching and trying to be smarter than everybody that i hate from Sweeney, Senyshen was just the perfect example. I know whoever they took here is a longshot to make the NHL but try to maximize your chances by not acting like an arrogant p**** and going so far off the board.
Reminds me of ppl who complain about reaches in the 5th round of the nfl draftWith all due respect to you and the sites who rank guys how many times to they actually watch a prospects full game? How many times do they talk to prospects to find out info like their work ethic, character, etc? Do they know if he recently had a growth spurt that could maybe affect their development?
There are lots of variables that I highly doubt the majority of these sites even think of let alone investigate. All I'm saying in this is it's a crapshoot anyway, you might as well take your guy in rounds 3-7, if you believe in them.
After the 1st round, that's how drafts work!! Lol.I didn't write him off at all. I hope he's great. maybe he will be. It's simply a comment on where he was taken. For every Lohrei there is a half dozen Quinn Olsons.
It's hilarious how I was responding toAs opposed to blind outrage?
Nobody knows how a single one of these kids will turn out in this draft. It’s all guesswork.
You have every right to feel negatively, I just don’t see the point in shitting on people for not losing their mind and sharing a different opinion.
Whether it’s the “best available” or a reach, at this point in the draft it’s all a shot in the dark.
Who the hell is Mason Lohrei?
I agree, it's why I believe in scouting and watching players but I wish they would take players more closely in line with where they are ranked. Chances are very good this kid would be available in the next round with where he was ranked, use this pick on a higher ranked player, maximize your chances of getting a potential player in the later rounds than reaching for someone who will most likely be around when you have your next pick.With all due respect to you and the sites who rank guys how many times to they actually watch a prospects full game? How many times do they talk to prospects to find out info like their work ethic, character, etc? Do they know if he recently had a growth spurt that could maybe affect their development?
There are lots of variables that I highly doubt the majority of these sites even think of let alone investigate. All I'm saying in this is it's a crapshoot anyway, you might as well take your guy in rounds 3-7, if you believe in them.
I don't but that said, it's still notable that they keep taking guys dozens of picks earlier than anybody else had them ranked.Do you know a single thing about even 1% of the guys still left on the board at this point?
yeah for sure...maybe they know something nobody else does.
All good man. You stay mad over a kid you’ve never seen play or heard of up until this point.It's hilarious how I was responding to
Can this place not be unbelievably stupid for…. Nevermind.
try to keep track of the original shitter
You're saying they should pick a "high ranked player"....who's to say they dont believe this guy has 2nd round value and they just got him almost in round 4. Why is their own internal list worth less than a consensus list?I agree, it's why I believe in scouting and watching players but I wish they would take players more closely in line with where they are ranked. Chances are very good this kid would be available in the next round with where he was ranked, use this pick on a higher ranked player, maximize your chances of getting a potential player in the later rounds than reaching for someone who will most likely be around when you have your next pick.
I used Senyshen as a comparison because that was the ultimate stupid reach, you had a pick 20 picks later, he would have been there and who would they have lost? JFK? He was worse than Senyshen.
WhyI trust them. Looking forward to hearing more about the kid.
Take a look at their current prospect pool.You're saying they should pick a "high ranked player"....who's to say they dont believe this guy has 2nd round value and they just got him almost in round 4. Why is their own internal list worth less than a consensus list?
Id be more concerned if this was a 1st or 2nd round pick opposed to end of the 3rd.
It’s the 92nd pick in 2023 and you’re referencing Zach Senyshyn.
Some of y’all are absolutely tapped.
Take a look at their current prospect pool.
HF Bruins Board preparing for the draft:They were prewritten before Boston even picked lmao