They didn’t buy Adama doubt they will.Adama's traore clause is 35m€, 40 is cheap compared to that
What has Berge to do with anything? He was 20 something million by the way.
I don't mind the idea of Kulusevski. But he is a young player that has lost his momentum a bit. Spurs would obviously be hoping to get him back on track. Fair enough. But you don't pay 40m for that.
It would make Kulusevski one of the most expensive Spurs transfers ever
Because his talent is just as good as Kulusevki and in some parts even better. Kulu is very good two-way player, but he doesn't have the dribble or creative skills that Bergie does.What has Berge to do with anything? He was 20 something million by the way.
I don't mind the idea of Kulusevski. But he is a young player that has lost his momentum a bit. Spurs would obviously be hoping to get him back on track. Fair enough. But you don't pay 40m for that.
It would make Kulusevski one of the most expensive Spurs transfers ever
Couldn't we buy Kulusevski? That's not pricey
Yes sirTwo wrongs don’t make a right. Gil loan would have been the correct answer.
40m for Kulusevski? Haha.
I like his potential. But 40m? Almost as stupid as paying 30m for Emerson.
What ever happend with Berge? He was supposed to be super good. He still plays for Sheffield.
Because his talent is just as good as Kulusevki and in some parts even better. Kulu is very good two-way player, but he doesn't have the dribble or creative skills that Bergie does.
- Sport1 says BMG have turned down Juve's "opening offer" for Zakaria.
- Finn Ole Becker will be joining TSG from St Pauli.
I wonder how much they want considering he leaves on a free.
Tici special
I wonder how much they want considering he leaves on a free.
Tici special
My guess: it's more about BMG still debating whether selling him is worth it at this point or if they should just hold onto him for the ruckrunde to make sure they don't slide into the relegation race. Hüdder is fighting to keep him until the summer and apparently he's not alone.
Paying Juventus back for the players they don’t want anymore?
It makes sense.
He needs to pay back for what he has ruined.
FWIW he should be much more McKennie than Rabiot/Ramsey/Arthur whether you bring him in now or only secure a pre-contract for the summer. Last year was a struggle for him and that lack of form/confidence bled into the Euros, but the two seasons prior he was excellent and he's been back in that form this campaign.
Unless BMG have done a very good job of keeping quiet that he's a real scumbag, I don't get why any club that needs a 6 hasn't been in on him...like he's exactly what BorussiaCorp's roster is missing behind their more advanced midfielders; great mobility, press resistant on the ball, a secure distributor with a significant passing radius, and when he pushes up to overload an attack zone, he has the skill to help create danger.
If he were under contract, he'd be a steal at 40M+
I am not sure if I should get excited or not. I got excited when Juve signed Ramsey, Rabiot and Arthur.
Zakaria can play with LocatelliThey get all the best Italian players every year and still need more? Is Locatelli not good enough now? I still want him on the Arsenal.