They were clearly not the best team in the league, nor even the second best.
I thought they played better over the course of the season than any other team, but at the end, they didn't have the requisite experience to win the league. Leiciester didn't have many players who've won big leagues, but Spurs had a very young side that might've been too inexperienced.
Which side was better? Leicester? I have a hard time considering a team that plays that style to be the best team in the league. There's being good defensively, good tactically, winning low scoring games, and then there's being out possessed by average teams, having very little depth in even just your lineup, playing bad football.
I'd like to see how the average poster here ranks Dembele vs. Promes. Willing to bet there's a massive gap.
Start a poll, if you want. Promes is five years older. Not sure its such a good comparison, although I think Dembele is probably a better player.