windsor7
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2015
- 9,954
- 2,995
Such as whom? Let's hear some examples. Bowler hasn't even been in the seat for full year yet, but if you're itching for new... who?
Dont worry maybe he wont sit on his hands anymore. Lol
Such as whom? Let's hear some examples. Bowler hasn't even been in the seat for full year yet, but if you're itching for new... who?
Dont worry maybe he wont sit on his hands anymore. Lol
So who would you bring in to replace him? If you're hoping for change, who's the change?
Angle back?The offence will depend on if Cyulle and Foudy take a big leap forward and Douglas and D'Amico take a step forward from where they have been at past 2 years.
Angles numbers have gone up almost 20 points every year. No reason to add him in with the others who haven’t improved or progressed nearly as well as Angle has.Angle back?
I'm just talking returning players. Up front, you'll have Cuylle, Foudy, Afan (Sp), Angle, Johnston, D'Amico. When all is said and done you should have two high scoring lines which is what most contending teams have plus the opportunity to add depth players.Angles numbers have gone up almost 20 points every year. No reason to add him in with the others who haven’t improved or progressed nearly as well as Angle has.
We should but if the players I mention don’t step up their games then the lines won’t be. I’m just not confident with this coaching staff that the forwards are going to make that jump forward. The overall progression of players with this staff hasn’t been great to this point.I'm just talking returning players. Up front, you'll have Cuylle, Foudy, Afan (Sp), Angle, Johnston, D'Amico. When all is said and done you should have two high scoring lines which is what most contending teams have plus the opportunity to add depth players.
The key will be the D and who Bowler is able to bring in. Time will tell if Medina can be a reliable starter.
I bow to your expertise HockeyPops... nonsense it is. I’ll keep my comments to myself.Most import defensemen in this league are good. Very few exceptions there. And quite frankly Piiroinen has not been great. It wouldn't surprise me if someone reported that it was the team's choice.
You are probably better off replacing them both vs keeping them both. IMO. And it costs you nothing to do it. Hence my response that it is nonsense to claim this as a crushing loss.
We should but if the players I mention don’t step up their games then the lines won’t be. I’m just not confident with this coaching staff that the forwards are going to make that jump forward. The overall progression of players with this staff hasn’t been great to this point.
At this point, I'll just be happy if we HAVE hockey in Sept. I know that approach isn't always taken well to but...
We should but if the players I mention don’t step up their games then the lines won’t be. I’m just not confident with this coaching staff that the forwards are going to make that jump forward. The overall progression of players with this staff hasn’t been great to this point.
I can't see the OHL going fan-free, too much revenue lost. Give me hockey with fans and I'm a happy camper; a winning season at this point is just icing on the cake.
I can't see the OHL going fan-free, too much revenue lost. Give me hockey with fans and I'm a happy camper; a winning season at this point is just icing on the cake.
Such as whom? Let's hear some examples. Bowler hasn't even been in the seat for full year yet, but if you're itching for new... who?
So let me get this straight. NBA, NHL, MLB are coming back I knowing they will lose hundreds of millions of dollars and still play. The OHL in their Ivory Tower is going to refuse to play in empty arenas? I have news for you the OHL is going to lose a lot of money regardless. Refusing to play without fans would piss off NHL teams who care about their prospects. Fans would be alienated and it would kill the league. Even if fans were allowed a portion would be apprehensive to return in the first place.
The OHL isn't the NHL, MLB, or NBA.
From David Branch last month - OHL Commissioner David Branch: ‘Right now, our league is planning to open up on time’
No, those leagues won’t “lose” anything. They just won’t make nearly as much revenue. They won’t “lose” millions and become brokeNo it's not those leagues stand to lose a lot more money than the OHL.
No, those leagues won’t “lose” anything. They just won’t make nearly as much revenue. They won’t “lose” millions and become broke
The OHL on the other hand will actually lose money. Meaning they will have zero ability to generate revenue while meanwhile having serious expenses. The NHL had most of their regular season and can still fall back on TV revenue. What will the OHL fall back on to make money?
No, those leagues won’t “lose” anything. They just won’t make nearly as much revenue. They won’t “lose” millions and become broke
The OHL on the other hand will actually lose money. Meaning they will have zero ability to generate revenue while meanwhile having serious expenses. The NHL had most of their regular season and can still fall back on TV revenue. What will the OHL fall back on to make money?
They've already pushed the Memorial Cup back a couple of weeks, so the season could start in October without issue, and maybe even make a back-heavy schedule. Say you start in late October... play 20 games before Christmas, then 48 after. Easy? No way. Possible? Yes. I'd imagine they're thinking about every option that involves bringing fans back, even if it's at a reduced rate. If people can actually stay home for the next month or two, get the numbers down, maybe we've got a shot at crowds being allowed on time.