Speculation: Will the 11th Overall Pick be traded ?

[Yultron]

I thought I would create a new thread since the last one was who would you trade the pick for but I wanna ask the question will the Canucks Actually trade it ?

I do not think it gets traded under any circumstances and we don’t have any cap space to bring in a player like Alexis Lafreniere etc who will command over 6m.

I am 99.99% sure the pick is staying and the Canucks build up there farm system because we know it needs more work and with 6 picks in the first 4 rounds we will absolutely have a great shot to rebuild it

Click to read more...

 

[Play]

I 100% believe it won’t be traded.

Also, this is getting out of hand

 

[Petey But Really Jim]

I am 99.99% sure the pick is staying and the Canucks build up there farm system because we know it needs more work and with 6 picks in the first 4 rounds we will absolutely have a great shot to rebuild it

What about this franchise ever suggests this?

 

[DonnyNucker]

I 100% believe it won’t be traded.

Also, this is getting out of hand

You are the one that keeps proposing strange trade proposals that include our 11th overall pick.

 

[Play]

You are the one that keeps proposing strange trade proposals that include our 11th overall pick.

And now I’ve stopped, Donny! And have been stopped for a while now

 

[rypper]

I'm going to settle on no.

 

[Petey But Really Jim]

It needs to be traded for cap space. We are Philly west.

 

[valkynax]

It shouldn't, but I feel that it will.

You only starts throwing future away for the present when you know 100% that you are solid playoff material and just needs that extra push and supp players to endure the grind.

Trading the Horvat pick for an injured Hronek is already a dumb f***ing move, trading our 11th overall will make the last move look like an act of genius.

No, I am not at all in favor of trading our picks away.

 

[Pastor Of Muppetz]

no.

 

[LordBacon]

They'll trade it cap relief so they can target their next overpaid UFA.

 

[PuckMunchkin]

They definitely should so they can accomplish their goal of making the playoffs next year.

 

[DarrenX]

Should it be? No. They don't have the cap space to improve the team.
Will it be? Probably.

 

[Fatass]

If 11OA is moved it will be to trade back and add draft picks.

 

[Petey But Really Jim]

If 11OA is moved it will be to trade back and add draft picks.

Lmao

 

[Bgav]

No

 

[Peter Griffin]

They didn’t trade it last year, although apparently they did consider for Dach, so I don’t think they’ll trade a more valuable piece, very likely closer to contributing. I give it an 80/20 chance. If they can acquire a young(less than 25 years old)top 6 center or top 4 d-man, I think they will. But such a trade likely isn’t out there.

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

If they do then they are full of shit regarding their claims of "keeping their 1sts".

 

[CanuckleBerry]

What would they trade it for?

I'm sure they'd love to swap it for another under-25 contributor.... but they literally don't have the cap space for another Hronek.

Would they try to trade it for an under-22 that is tracking well and still on an ELC? Why would another team make a swap like that for an 11th overall? If their prospect is tracking well enough that's a better asset than an unproven 1st rounder.

Do you they use it to shed salary? Who though? It's not enough to dump OEL. And it's overkill to dump anyone else. Poolman + Pearson? That's doesn't make much sense.

As much as I am sure management is salivating at the thought of trading the pick to improve, I don't see a realistic way they can.

 

[Lindgren]

What would they trade it for?

I'm sure they'd love to swap it for another under-25 contributor.... but they literally don't have the cap space for another Hronek.

Would they try to trade it for an under-22 that is tracking well and still on an ELC? Why would another team make a swap like that for an 11th overall? If their prospect is tracking well enough that's a better asset than an unproven 1st rounder.

Do you they use it to shed salary? Who though? It's not enough to dump OEL. And it's overkill to dump anyone else. Poolman + Pearson? That's doesn't make much sense.

As much as I am sure management is salivating at the thought of trading the pick to improve, I don't see a realistic way they can.

OEL can't be dumped. He has a no movement clause.

 

[MS]

I'm sure they'll look at things but it's hard to see that pick being moved in a deal that makes sense.

 

[CanuckleBerry]

OEL can't be dumped. He has a no movement clause.

Which he could theoretically waive, but that's beside the point I was making. Yes the NMC makes it even more unlikely, but no team would take the 11th overall for that contract anyways.

 

[madrigal77]

Which he could theoretically waive, but that's beside the point I was making. Yes the NMC makes it even more unlikely, but no team would take the 11th overall for that contract anyways.

It would probably take this and next years firsts to move it. Worst trade in Canucks history and even consideration for league history. Absolute debacle.

 

[StrictlyCommercial]

Traded to the Coyotes with OEL and Connor Garland.

 

[Peter Griffin]

Traded to the Coyotes with OEL and Connor Garland.

The circle of life completed.

 

[Nucker101]

Traded to the Coyotes with OEL and Connor Garland.

Canucks also throw in a future 2nd because we hate picking in that round