Regardless if he reaches it or not, (I think that it’s unlikely) he already is the greatest pound for pound scorer this league has ever seen.
Actually pound for pound, Gretzky still have shot at it
Regardless if he reaches it or not, (I think that it’s unlikely) he already is the greatest pound for pound scorer this league has ever seen.
No one is arguing the delta in players. Gretzky was so far ahead of everyone else (not Mario), that sort of gap just doesn't happen anymore. 4th line guys today would be 2nd or maybe 1st line guys in the 80's.
Actually pound for pound, Gretzky still have shot at it
Goals since Ovechkin entered the league in 2005:
1) Ovechkin - 650 (GP 1063)
2) Crosby - 436 (GP 922)
3) E. Staal - 401 (GP 1072)
4) Marleau - 395 (GP 1077)
5) Malkin - 388 (GP 839)
Would you really suggest that Kadri or Landeskog are better goal scorers than Bossy? That Doughty's better than Orr? That Jones is better than Sawchuk?
Why are you listing hall of famers? Can you name EVERY run of the mill top six forward from the 80s? The third and fourth liners of today (not goons, but Cizikas, Brown, etc.) are more talented than the “average” top six forward was 30-40 years ago. That shouldn’t be too controversial a thought.
Because the thread is about HOFers (Ovechkin/Gretkzy).
I don't think he does, I just don't think he plays long enough but here is a tweet I just saw:
Those are generously low numbers too. No reason he couldn't get another 45-50 next year.
I reckon he'll get another 7 this year.
50 - 19/20
45 - 20/21
45 - 21/22
37 - 22/23
30 - 23/24
28 - 24/25
That's 235 + 7 = 242 goals. Not impossible. Could get that on just the PP
I don't think he does, I just don't think he plays long enough but here is a tweet I just saw:
Why are you listing hall of famers? Can you name EVERY run of the mill top six forward from the 80s? The third and fourth liners of today (not goons, but Cizikas, Brown, etc.) are more talented than the “average” top six forward was 30-40 years ago. That shouldn’t be too controversial a thought.
Why would they be? Perhaps they are better because of training and such(which would make it harder for the absolute best to stand out) but more talented is a huge reach, unless you believe human species has drastically evolved during the last 40 years or so. Infact I would argue that is indeed a very "controversial thought".
Why would they be? Perhaps they are better because of training and such(which would make it harder for the absolute best to stand out) but more talented is a huge reach, unless you believe human species has drastically evolved during the last 40 years or so. Infact I would argue that is indeed a very "controversial thought".
There’s better coaching, more specialized skills coaching, kids are learning to stick handle at insane levels through systems and drills that people like Pavel Barber develop. Kids begin taking hockey seriously as a career option much earlier in life. Scouting has also come leaps and bounds so that we’re pulling more talent from all corners of the globe than ever before. It really isn’t that controversial at all.
Why would they be? Perhaps they are better because of training and such(which would make it harder for the absolute best to stand out) but more talented is a huge reach, unless you believe human species has drastically evolved during the last 40 years or so. Infact I would argue that is indeed a very "controversial thought".
All things you mention have zero to do with talent.