Totally missing my point.
My point was that virtually nobody saw Radulov to Montreal happening. However you want to slice it, that was a deal made between Bergevin and Radulov. Therefore Bergevin could once again surprise. He very well may not, but the Radulov signing proves that he can. That was my point.
And people will have their opinions on the UFA debacle. In the end it takes two to make a deal, so it’s a failure on both sides. Putting 100% of the blame on Bergevin and 0% on Radulov may fit your narrative, but likely diverges from the truth of the matter.
And yes, I have had dogs for a long time. Not sure how that has anything to do with whether or not we could get a surprise in UFA.