Harry Wong
Registered User
- Oct 25, 2009
- 452
- 50
How can we give Eller a top six role without trading Desharnais?
We can't so lets do it.
How can we give Eller a top six role without trading Desharnais?
I don't think you took into consideration how many of those points Eller got playing wing for another center...did you?
By the way, I love Eller, so much that I think he will replace Pleks. The way I see it if the Habs want to have a somewhat dominant center line in the next 3 years our centers should be: Chucky, Eller, De la Rose +whoever (maybe Gregoire). The smurf time will be officially over at that point.
Maybe Eller would've made a better winger than center? Only knock on Eller is his skating. Galchenyuk has the same skating problems as Eller. They seem to be missing that jump in their feet, like Gallagher or Subban.
Maybe Eller would've made a better winger than center? Only knock on Eller is his skating. Galchenyuk has the same skating problems as Eller. They seem to be missing that jump in their feet, like Gallagher or Subban.
Maybe Eller would've made a better winger than center? Only knock on Eller is his skating. Galchenyuk has the same skating problems as Eller. They seem to be missing that jump in their feet, like Gallagher or Subban.
Well shoot. I guess he didn't really finish first in the speed contests the team had the last 3 years ?
I guess he's not one of our only 2 players that can skate around with the puck for days without losing it also ?
Do you even hockey?
Well shoot. I guess he didn't really finish first in the speed contests the team had the last 3 years ?
I guess he's not one of our only 2 players that can skate around with the puck for days without losing it also ?
Do you even hockey?
Make Plekanec a 3rd line C that takes the toughest matchups and plays a ton on the PK but give his PP time to Eller instead.
Sure lars can skate with the puck all day long.its what he does or doesnt do with the puck that makes him what he is.I dont get this thread either.doesnt regress mean to get worse? He has been average at best his whole career.not sure it would be possible for him to get worse.
Make Plekanec a 3rd line C that takes the toughest matchups and plays a ton on the PK but give his PP time to Eller instead.
This thread started when Eller started his mega-slump.
And as for being average his whole carreer...well, he was better than Desharnais in 12-13.
Was our best center in the first 30 games of this year....and was our best forward in the PO. If he's average at best, what it means for the others...cause for the last 2 years, Eller was our best center 65% of the time
Arbitration really ?
That guy has no case
Arbitration really ?
That guy has no case
A 26 point -15 season makes him nowhere near our best center.time for him to step up large .only problem is if he struggles mightily again he will have little value.
A 26 point -15 season makes him nowhere near our best center.time for him to step up large .only problem is if he struggles mightily again he will have little value.
Arbitration really ?
That guy has no case
Since the Therrien/Bergevin era began this is the even strength production of our centers.
Desharnais: 64pts in 149 games
Plekanec: 56pts in 150 games
Eller: 57pts in 141 games
Eller has outproduced Plekanec and is 7pts behind Desharnais. Does anyone seriously doubt that playing with Pacioretty wouldn't more than cover those 7pts, let alone the zone starts that DD gets.
This whole Eller doesn't have the offensive potential, or he's too inconsistent is complete BS. Eller deserves a real shot in the top-6.
How can we give Eller a top six role without trading Desharnais?
A 26 point -15 season makes him nowhere near our best center.time for him to step up large .only problem is if he struggles mightily again he will have little value.
Arbitration really ?
That guy has no case
Agreed.
Pacioretty-DD-Parenteau
Chucky-Eller-Gally
Bourque-Plekanec-whoever
Give the EGG line second unit PP duty.
If Eller can produce and be responsible on D, he will take over the 2nd line role and that means Plekanec is expendable. Lars is cheaper, younger, stronger, meaner. H needs to become more consistent, more reliable on D and improve his decision making with the puck which are Pleks strong points.
If Eller can produce and be responsible on D, he should take over the 2nd line role and that means Plekanec is expendable. Lars is cheaper, younger, stronger, meaner. H needs to become more consistent, more reliable on D and improve his decision making with the puck which are Pleks strong points.
However, many analysts believe Eller is 3rd line material, this next season is critical and will define his role in the team IMHO.