authentic
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2015
- 25,955
- 11,020
Crosby would have.
06-07
10-11
12-13
13-14
14-15
Now he wasent healthy in 07-08 or 11-12 and 16-17.
Crosby has a legit shot at 8 art ross is healthy and bare minimum would have 5.
Jagr pretty easily.
Each would have 5
Jagr didnt lose any to injury did he?
Crosby would have 11 12 and 13.
15 is dishonnest to count. He lost fair and square. I dont consider ~5 games missed to be "injuries".
I know 2012 is a bit of a stretch with 22 games only - but considering how he was the year before and after and even in those 22 games i dont see any reason he doesnt also win.
While I see what you're saying, those five games probably did make a difference. Crosby had the highest PPG in the league that season, and all he would have needed to win the Art Ross is 4 points in those five games that he missed, which is easily doable for a player of his calibre. Of course players can go cold and he may not have gotten the 4 points that he needed to win in those five games, but I'd say that in any given five game stretch in Crosby's career, the odds are much greater that he scores 4+ points as opposed to fewer than 4. That's why to me, 2014-2015 falls into the "highly likely, but not a complete certainty" category when considering seasons where Crosby would have won the Art Ross if not for the time that he missed.
Seguin was on the same points per game pace as Crosby that year, but missed some games.While I see what you're saying, those five games probably did make a difference. Crosby had the highest PPG in the league that season, and all he would have needed to win the Art Ross is 4 points in those five games that he missed, which is easily doable for a player of his calibre. Of course players can go cold and he may not have gotten the 4 points that he needed to win in those five games, but I'd say that in any given five game stretch in Crosby's career, the odds are much greater that he scores 4+ points as opposed to fewer than 4. That's why to me, 2014-2015 falls into the "highly likely, but not a complete certainty" category when considering seasons where Crosby would have won the Art Ross if not for the time that he missed.
In 1997, Jagr might have lost the Ross due to injuries.... although Lemieux might still have won it. Would've been a close one.
Crosby. Jagr benefited from other people's injuries (Lindros, Lemieux, Forsberg) more than anything.
I don't think Crosby would win in 2007-08 or 2011-12. Ovechkin and Malkin were otherworldly that years it would be tough even for Crosby.
I don't think Crosby would win in 2007-08 or 2011-12. Ovechkin and Malkin were otherwordly that years it would be tough even for Crosby.