greasysnapper
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2018
- 2,588
- 1,694
It'll be John Hynes if the Devils **** the bed really bad out of the gate.
They gave him a 5 year deal and he’s yet to coach a single game. Seems highly unlikely he’s fired any time in the next three years at the earliest.Todd McLellan?
Previous two coaches, Stevens and Desjardins didn't last long at all, so arguably LA not being gun shy increases the odds?
Why expect them to "improve by a considerable margin", when most of the middle and bottom-6 is trash?Don't know if he will be first but I feel that if the Canucks don't improve by a considerable margin then Green will be gone, possibly by the all star break.
Hynes with an early lead.
It wont be CJ
If he is fired anytime soon it will be because Molson finally decided enough is enough and fired everyone form the GM on down.....Also thats a summer type move.
Babcock will be gonzo by xmas......
It's the only coach's name they know outside of their ownTo anyone saying Babcock: the only way that happens is if the Leafs miss the playoffs or lose in the first round again. So unless you're expecting zero NHL coaches to get fired between now and April at the earliest, Babcock is wrong choice here. That being said, I'd like to be wrong on this because I think he needs to go.
I'll predict the Jets will struggle early on and Maurice will be canned by the end of November.
do you not know firing da coach midseason is how you win the cup now?Sharks were two games away from making the SCF for the 2nd time since he has been coaching there. So mind telling me why you hate him?
Babcock. Sooner the better
I can't believe Torts isn't getting much of a mention here when he's easily the first to go. The jackets are a skeleton of what they were and he's a demanding coach with a short shelf life wherever he's been. A slow start (which is likely given the improvements of Jersey and the Rangers combined with the Blue Jacket departures) and he's going to have one press conference too many that ends in a meltdown.
I hear people are saying Maurice, but that's more of a winnipeg fan fantasy than anything with substance. Winnipeg convinced a decent coach to live in Winnipeg during the winter, they aren't going to roll the dice that it could happen twice and replace Maurice. He's entrenched, get used to it.
That is all absolutely true, however when the team struggles is that going to matter? The GM isn't going to say "oh, this is my fault. I'll be quitting now" he's going to fire the coach and pretend the players need a new voice behind the bench. He isn't going to let Torts tell the press all year that he doesn't have the horses to compete when he's the guy responsible for the horses.Any issues in Columbus this year are totally at the feet of the GM. They bought last year and went for it. It was a great run that came up short so no one will complain too much.
Torts will be fine, its not his fault he no longer has the horses to compete......
Such a stupid comment. Coaches typically don't have the freedom to pick and choose where they go (there's limited jobs and their careers can be short), and when they do I'd think roster quality ranks above weather. They always have to be proving themselves for their next job because there's high turnover.I can't believe Torts isn't getting much of a mention here when he's easily the first to go. The jackets are a skeleton of what they were and he's a demanding coach with a short shelf life wherever he's been. A slow start (which is likely given the improvements of Jersey and the Rangers combined with the Blue Jacket departures) and he's going to have one press conference too many that ends in a meltdown.
I hear people are saying Maurice, but that's more of a winnipeg fan fantasy than anything with substance. Winnipeg convinced a decent coach to live in Winnipeg during the winter, they aren't going to roll the dice that it could happen twice and replace Maurice. He's entrenched, get used to it.
To anyone saying Babcock: the only way that happens is if the Leafs miss the playoffs or lose in the first round again. So unless you're expecting zero NHL coaches to get fired between now and April at the earliest, Babcock is wrong choice here. That being said, I'd like to be wrong on this because I think he needs to go.
Babcock was nearly made to walk the plank after the Maple Leafs lost to the Bruins in the first round last spring. Sources say there was considerable disagreement in the Maple Leafs front office on the matter of the famously stubborn head coach’s continuing employment. Certainly it’s no secret Babcock’s grind-and-size leanings don’t often jibe with GM Kyle Dubas’s skill-above-all vision of the sport. Clearly it was a point of contention that Babcock spent the season taking not-so-veiled shots at Toronto’s roster makeup.
In the end, there was influential support behind keeping Babcock around to begin the fifth year of his eight-year contract. Body-cam video of the relevant boardroom meeting has yet to become available, but it’s safe to say Brendan Shanahan, the team president who once played for Babcock in Detroit and hired him in Toronto in 2015, can be a powerful advocate.
Still, no executive-coach alliance is eternal, and the message to Babcock was clear. Room for error is minimal. Even a slow start to the season could be enough to thrust Marlies coach Sheldon Keefe into the Maple Leafs gig.
Such a stupid comment. Coaches typically don't have the freedom to pick and choose where they go (there's limited jobs and their careers can be short), and when they do I'd think roster quality ranks above weather. They always have to be proving themselves for their next job because there's high turnover.