- Apr 27, 2005
- 33,665
- 29,907
I am starting this thread to see who you guys think takes more punishment, and possibly who dives more. As they grow to the NHL, who will handle the physical contact better?
Habsfan 32 said:I think Crosby dives more from what I saw but he takes alot more hits also. I think Perry will have a harder time adjusting to ther physical play in the NHL.
stocktrader said:For those that don't know, with a prospect there is always concern whether their game will translate to the NHL.
stocktrader said:Crosby is in my opinion the first player to pattern his game around succeeding in the modern game.
Pepper said:OHL is more physical league than Q so I think Perry has learned a thing or two about physical play.
Hmm. I'm tempted to say that Crosby takes more punishment, partly because he seems to seek it out a bit, and also because I'm not convinced he gets much "protection" from his teammates.hockeyman28 said:I am starting this thread to see who you guys think takes more punishment, and possibly who dives more. As they grow to the NHL, who will handle the physical contact better?
Vlad The Impaler said:Indeed.
I am not sure I understand. What exactly do you mean?
Because the way I see it, this could mean a dozen different things, and they all sound disturbingly wrong.
Jason MacIsaac said:Crosby will be able to take the abuse he takes, he has grit and is strong. Perry on the other hand will not last in the NHL. He is soft, dives and also plays dirty. He also has no speed what so ever so I don't think he will stay in the NHL for long as an impact player. Maybe Yannick Perrault
Pepper said:Btw, comparing Perry to Perrault is nothing short of ridiculous.
You could use Yanic Perreault. You could just about equally use Jason Allison, ignoring position... semi-similar style, late-ish first rounders who dominated in junior, good height but a bit lanky and slow looking... Allison took his time to adapt to the speed of the NHL game, but he did it. I can imagine Perry doing something similar perhaps.Sammy said:Why is that? The only difference is size. Perrault lit it up in Juniors, & wasnt a real high draft pick. In fact, Perrault as a Junior could probably skate circles around Perry.
Sammy said:Why is that? The only difference is size. Perrault lit it up in Juniors, & wasnt a real high draft pick. In fact, Perrault as a Junior could probably skate circles around Perry.
You are useing leagues played in and size to disprove an arguement about players styles? Perrault and Perry are very similar on the ice, both play soft, both have good vision and nice wrist shots, both are slow, both don't like physical abuse and both can set up plays. Perry is the modern version of Perrault in my opinion. The case can't be made for Allison because Allisons assists didn't come on the rush like Perry's, he set up down low useing his size setting up players in front.Pepper said:Perrault was 5-11, Perry is 6'3
Perreault played in Q, Perry in O
Perrault was more of a goalscorer, Perry is more of a playmaker
Honestly, that comparison is piss-poor. In fact Crosby is probably closer to Perrault than Perry is.
Jason Allison is the best comparison I can think of, in fact their careers have so far been almost identical
Both are 6'3, both played in London Knights, both are more of playmakers, neither is known for good skating.
Jason MacIsaac said:You are useing leagues played in and size to disprove an arguement about players styles?