CupInSIX
My cap runneth over
Rangers can for Janmark and Smith
I get the impression fans don’t want to lose Smith
If anything, they should find a way to re-sign him.
Rangers can for Janmark and Smith
I get the impression fans don’t want to lose Smith
If anything, they should find a way to re-sign him.
Once Eichel is ready then you can afford to put Stone's offense on LTIR. I'm sure Patches will be hurt again shortly also. Neither of them will ever get through an entire playoffs healthy.
Even if we get a sucker for Dadonov between now and July 1 can they fit Smith under the cap to re-sign him?
Smith can likely only stay if Dadonov, Janmark, Brossoit and one of Pacioretty/Marchessault/Martinez all aren't on the team next season.
And he's willing to sign between 4 and 5.
Pacioretty and I'll take it. If he takes say 4.5 throw in an extra year on the back end.
GMs around the league believe we're gonna LTIR Stone. "Stone has a degenerative back injury"
I don't mind the Pacioretty idea for next season because it is the final year of the contract and we could probably swing one decently nice piece while clearing more than enough room to not be right up against the cap again, or we could possibly sign Hague and Roy to slightly longer deals.
And re-signing Smith is fine but I don't support giving an extra year on the back to anybody over 30 already.
You could make an equal case for/against trading Patches, WB & Martinez.
And then all of a sudden they make some trades to clear cap space on deadline day. Psyche.
Wild Bill has a lot of value to us, even if he's supplanted at 2C, as a top six LW. I don't think they should look at trading him just yet.
If he continues to struggle offensively into next season I think the possibility opens up to trade at a higher value with Brisson, Morozov, Dorofeyev, Dean, etc. being closer to NHL shots and Roy, Patrick, Howden getting another season to prove something more. Also to see which level Stephenson will show up consistently.
With the news of a possible 85-90% captain for five years though, I think keeping the misfits together one more season is more likely for team morale.
He's 29 and I wasn't thinking of 7 or 8 years like Petro. I was thinking 5 x 4 instead of 6 x 3.
You could argue that
Marchessault-Eichel
Pacioretty-Stephenson
would be 2 very lethal scoring lines, and Roy is more than ready to take 3C full time.
He's seven weeks away from being 31.
5x4 works for me as the high end but I wouldn't go above 5 for any amount of years.
I'm not big on contracts going beyond 35, four years is the most I would go and people have constantly said he likes it here and has bought in and with no state tax, I would do his current contract for four more years as our top end and try for a little less for four years.
I would think he could get 7 x 4 or 5 from another team, here's hoping he'll take the hometown discount, especially as there is no state tax and he'll likely have more opportunity here for off-ice income.
And you could argue that Eichel makes Pacioretty superfluous, plus he has trade value and we could use some kids on ELC's to help with cap issues and to give us flexibility.
And yes, Roy is ready for 3C, he already basically is, and he's doing pretty well considering he plays with Janmark and Koleslaw as his wings.
Eichel has a great shot, but you want him setting up scorers. We'll see how he does with Patches & Dadonov but I suspect Marchy would be a 40 goal scorer on his line (maybe 50 with a shooter tutor ). The more options for a new top line, the better IMO. Just look at how Buffalo struggled to get a top line going consistently with Skinner & Hall.
7 million for a guy that's top 10 in goals per game the past 3 years is decent value, especially considering he was playing some of the best hockey of his career before his clean up surgery. Most of the time, you trade away a guy like that and you immediately regret it.
I'd be shocked if Smith signed for less than 6x6 or 5x6. I was going to say basically the same as Vegas Knight in my post yesterday. Smith is a very, very good 200' player. Every team should be trying to sign him. Having said that, do you really want to tie down another 31 year old to such a long contract?
I'd be shocked if Smith signed for less than 6x6 or 5x6. I was going to say basically the same as Vegas Knight in my post yesterday. Smith is a very, very good 200' player. Every team should be trying to sign him. Having said that, do you really want to tie down another 31 year old to such a long contract?
And you could argue that Eichel makes Pacioretty superfluous, plus he has trade value and we could use some kids on ELC's to help with cap issues and to give us flexibility.
And yes, Roy is ready for 3C, he already basically is, and he's doing pretty well considering he plays with Janmark and Koleslaw as his wings.