JustJim
Registered User
Scott Hartnell, Wayne Simmons, Sean Couterier, Kimmo Timmonen, and Claude Giroux are all greatly over rated.....and are all greatly under achieving!
The idea behind this logic is if you placed another played in that role they'd produce similarly. Power play production is much easier to replace than 5v5 production.
Hartnell is overrated IMO. He really hasn't looked like a 1st line guy aside from the year with Jagr and G. I think a lot of players are seen as they should be..........in 1-3 years. Couts will be a good player I think in hind sight he woulda been better off not being called up unless he got 2nd line minutes when we drafted him.
Voracek. I think he's the only player who's name I haven't seen in this thread in a negative way, and he seems to have escaped the wrath of hfboards so far. Actually he still seems quite popular, but he's been as disappointing as anybody this year imo. He's coming off a good year in a shortened season in which his shooting percentage was well over his career norm, and he's otherwise been a solid but unspectacular contributor in his career.
Who are you replacing the production with? The offensive dynamo known as Sean Couturier?
To reiterate, there is no shortage of culprits in the Flyers offensive woes. Support players like Read, Simmonds, Sean Couturier and blueline offensive triggers such as Kimmo Timonen (zero points) and Mark Streit (two assists) can certainly be doing more to help, especially in the absences of the injured Vincent Lecavalier (one goal, three points in five games) and top line left wing Scott Hartnell (zero points). McGinn has been the only one doing his part in that regard, with Brayden Schenn (two goals, five points) being the only other player in the top eight who is somewhat absolved. Even Schenn can be more consistent, however.
Ultimately, the buck has to stop with Claude Giroux and Jakub Voracek -- and the former just a tad more than the latter -- to be the offensive anchors of this club. The team's 1-7-0 record has a lot to do with the lack of production from the top line. It is flat out unacceptable for both players to be without a goal at this point. Likewise, for the team's top two forward playmakers to have just three assists apiece, is very worrisome.
At the end of the day, Giroux needs to be the team's best player. He's the captain, and the one who needs to be able to generate or turn momentum. Yes, he's been unlucky on a couple of shots that hit the post but the truth of the matter is that he's not creating enough scoring chances for himself or his linemates.
While Flyers coach Craig Berube is understandably unhappy with the lack of production from his top line, I think you can read between the lines right now that Jakub Voracek is one player with him he's rather displeased right now.
This is just my own speculation but call it an educated guess: I would not be surprised if number 93 is one of the players who has heard his name barked out by the Chief in team critiques, either in private or in the locker room.
The one absolute truism I've learned about hockey over the years is that the more you know about the game, the more you realize you don't know.
That does not mean that general manager Paul Holmgren deserves a free ride for putting together a roster that failed to make the playoffs last year and is off to the league's worst start this year. Actually, what it means is that the burden is his -- not ours -- to recognize the areas that need improvement and find solutions to bring in better-fitting pieces that fit under the salary cap and do not require trading asset overpayment in the deal.
Realistically, I think that Holmgren and Craig Berube will get the rest of this season to get this team into the playoffs and win a round or two. If the club falls short of that, I would not be surprised if Ron Hextall is the GM come next season and he gets to pick his own coach. It's not that either man is bad at his job.
That's just how it goes in hockey, especially in a win-now market like Philly. When you lose too often, players get traded and decision-makers eventually get changed as well.
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Bill...Pronger-Effect-Giroux-Voracek-Trades/45/54992
I hate to say it... But should this team have not let Matt Carle walk?
I hate to say it... But should this team have not let Matt Carle walk?
Carle had his missteps and flaws to his game, so I wasn't particularly concerned when they let him go. But thinking back now, I thought he provided something that we don't get from our current defense corps. It's hard to pinpoint what that is, since he wasn't extremely good at anything, but in terms of offense he seemed to have connected the defense pairing better to our forwards when it came to us going on offense. So now I do kind of wish Holmgren tied him up rather than Coburn. But maybe that's just because I've been really annoyed with the latter last season, as well as this.I hate to say it... But should this team have not let Matt Carle walk?
Carle had his missteps and flaws to his game, so I wasn't particularly concerned when they let him go. But thinking back now, I thought he provided something that we don't get from our current defense corps. It's hard to pinpoint what that is, since he wasn't extremely good at anything, but in terms of offense he seemed to have connected the defense pairing better to our forwards when it came to us going on offense. So now I do kind of wish Holmgren tied him up rather than Coburn. But maybe that's just because I've been really annoyed with the latter last season, as well as this.
yeah i was never Carles biggest supporter while he was here, buuuuuttt
Carle > Coburn
Carle > Grossmann
Carle > Streit
Carle > Gustafsson
Carle > Timonen now
Schenn is the only piece i wouldn't take him over, simply because of Schenn's age and the fact that i think he will still get alot better.
simmonds is not overrated, is not easy to score a goal when he play with raffl