Beerfish
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2007
- 19,513
- 5,665
I appreciate that it is not rocket science, its way more subjective and difficult then that. Not many text books and peer reviewed studies to expand on. Its way more like game theory.
Askarov should not go in the top 5. Its too high to chance on a goalie in a good deep draft. The sens have a bunch of goaltending prospects that have the potential to good, very good or much less likely "elite". Reaching for a goalie in their position would be daft.
But please enlighten me on your theory. Who are these goalies that a) arr consistently "elite', b) a high draft pick, let's say top 10 to give you an edge and c) have consistently driven team success.
I think it is evident that goalies are hard to predict. I prefer not spending a potentially blue chip assett on one.
Also, I think it is clear that a good system well executed with competent goaltending does keep the puck out of the net. Something that you do not have to waste a high pick for.
Question. Why did the gap in talent drop relative to other poaitions grow or even exist in the first place? I think it didn't. Goalies are just hard to predict. They were never drafted proportionately in the first round. High goalie pics often turn out to be bad or just good. Goailes that turn out to be "Elite" are distributed all across the draft. The best you can say about high draft goalies is that they have a higher floor. You can't say that about high draft picks of other position. They have a higher floor and are way, way more likely to be elite.
In my option Askarov goes 10-15 because of that high floor. I wouldnt want that for my team but hey, we aren't a hockey hive mind.
Fun fact. What do Brodeur, Hasek and Roy have in common. None of them went in the top 10.
In a redraft they sure as hell would have though right?
Goalie is the most important single position on a team and you get busts or guys that disappoint from every single position. I've never gotten this taboo of not wanting to drat a goalie high.