DarkandStormy
Registered User
Maybe my memory is wrong, but are the poll options wrong? Doesn't he have only until Dec. 1 to sign?
Maybe my memory is wrong, but are the poll options wrong? Doesn't he have only until Dec. 1 to sign?
Maybe my memory is wrong, but are the poll options wrong? Doesn't he have only until Dec. 1 to sign?
Moderators can edit the options, so I took the liberty of making that change.Mea culpa. December 1 was the Nylander drop dead date last season.
I tried to edit the choices but wasn't able to. So the Opening nite through Dec 31 should read thru Dec 1.
Continued hope that something nicer can be achieved? That could very well be a "we'd like better, but if we can't get better we'll take that" situation.^What the hell took so long if it's a 3 x 5?
I'd insist on a C.Also (whispers whispers) this is an extremely tradable contract, if we want to try that route for a 1LW.
Because I'm always wrong I changed my vote to after Opening Night.
And here I was tempted to reprimand you, since attempts to use those sorts of powers for good supposedly never work out.See, I told y'all.
Maybe they'll wanna do twinsie deals like Toews and KaneSee, I told y'all. Good deal but just kicks the can down the road to some extent. Good news is he'll still be RFA; bad news him and Jones same year now.
Lets do it (Marner)!!Jarmo is pretty good as this gm stuff . Easily tradeable contract if he were to let’s say , make an offer to the leafs for Marner . We also have tons of cap space and flexibility . Regardless , a player of Zach’s talent on the blueline locked in for 3 years at 5 mil , is a steal