I fairness though, Johansen was one of our best players last season in the playoffs. You really think we'll regret trading a guy that at best is our 3rd best defenseman for a top line center?
Because one poster using only basic stats as arguments has a mindset that points are the only thing the salaries are based on and ignores all the other factors pointed out. He has named himself after McDavid.What does that thread have to do with McDavid? Geez [mod]
Forsberg and their 4 top pairing defenseman were carrying the offense though..
You are either a straight hater or didn't watch the playoffsForsberg and their 4 top pairing defenseman were carrying the offense though..
Is he a top line centre tho?I fairness though, Johansen was one of our best players last season in the playoffs. You really think we'll regret trading a guy that at best is our 3rd best defenseman for a top line center?
Silly.I can't imagine finding a Preds fan who wouldn't make that deal again. Just because he doesn't score goals doesn't mean he wasn't worth it.
Is he a top line centre tho?
He was a definitely an elite center in last year's playoffs, on both sides of the puck.Is he a top line centre tho?
Silly.
Yes. Again he centered 2 30+ goal scoring wingers in back to back seasons what other centers have done that?Is he a top line centre tho?
Not the worst trade ever but looking back they certainly could have done better. You can't win every trade however.Why?
He's the best center we've ever had, scores at a .75 rate, centers two 60 point wingers, is good defensively and is a beast in the playoffs. We've waited 20 years to get a no.1 center under 35, I'd gladly trade Seth Jones every day of the week and sign Johansen to a Toews-esque contract and still be ok with it.
Just because he's not an elite center like a Malkin or Crosby does not mean it was a bad deal for Nashville, or that Johansen's a bad player. You just lack context.
Literally had one good playoff run but was invisible the playoffs before..Why?
He's the best center we've ever had, scores at a .75 rate, centers two 60 point wingers, is good defensively and is a beast in the playoffs. We've waited 20 years to get a no.1 center under 35, I'd gladly trade Seth Jones every day of the week and sign Johansen to a Toews-esque contract and still be ok with it.
Just because he's not an elite center like a Malkin or Crosby does not mean it was a bad deal for Nashville, or that Johansen's a bad player. You just lack context.
Not the worst trade ever but looking back they certainly could have done better. You can't win every trade however.
Literally had one good playoff run but was invisible the playoffs before..
Actually, "literally" 27p in 34 career playoff games. Few current players average better.Literally had one good playoff run but was invisible the playoffs before..
27 points in 34 games is good.Literally had one good playoff run but was invisible the playoffs before..
Why?
He's the best center we've ever had, scores at a .75 rate, centers two 60 point wingers, is good defensively and is a beast in the playoffs. We've waited 20 years to get a no.1 center under 35, I'd gladly trade Seth Jones every day of the week and sign Johansen to a Toews-esque contract and still be ok with it.
Just because he's not an elite center like a Malkin or Crosby does not mean it was a bad deal for Nashville, or that Johansen's a bad player. You just lack context.
It's about value, not context
When you factor in age + cap hit, Jones has considerably more value than Johansen
It reminds me of the Chelios for Savard trade. Yes, Savard had some productive seasons and the Habs won the Cup, but in hindsight, it's looked at as one of the worst trades in NHL history
So give it another decade or so and let's see how you feel about things then
McDavid or Stamkos weren't available for Jones. Which top center could the Preds have traded Jones for instead? Duchene?It's about value, not context
When you factor in age + cap hit, Jones has considerably more value than Johansen
It reminds me of the Chelios for Savard trade. Yes, Savard had some productive seasons and the Habs won the Cup, but in hindsight, it's looked at as one of the worst trades in NHL history
So give it another decade or so and let's see how you feel about things then
He's lazy. That's why we tossed him for Jones... we knew his heart isn't always in it and paying him a ton would be a bad decision.
Seems to be working out well for Nashville so far.It's about value, not context
When you factor in age + cap hit, Jones has considerably more value than Johansen
It reminds me of the Chelios for Savard trade. Yes, Savard had some productive seasons and the Habs won the Cup, but in hindsight, it's looked at as one of the worst trades in NHL history
So give it another decade or so and let's see how you feel about things then