Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 79,091
- 54,196
Get Sam Bennett as a reclamation project at center and he turns into Ryan O'Reilly?
Valid point.The GM has the most control over which of their 50 contracts end up on the final 23-man roster that Babs can choose from, though.
From there, the coach only gets to determine which combination of 20 of those 23 guys they want to use.
Justin Holl's chances of playing can be drastically improved or diminished by Dubas, as long as he's the person determining whether or not Holl makes that 23-man roster.
At that point this move has a zero chance of happening.
...and rightfully so
Last time Dubas was in the interim GM Chair it was Mark Arcobello he signed due to advanced analytics.
With Kyle Dubas noting that the Leafs are going to move Nick Spaling back to center, Arcobello could join a center group that currently looks like this: Kadri, Bozak, Holland, Spaling, Arcobello, Carrick.
It follows the theme of the day, along with the Matt Hunwick and P.A. Parenteau adds – cheap flyers on players with good possession numbers.
kyle dubas is much more theo epstein than billy bean, a gm that uses new style analytics that isnt hamstrung by financial restrictions. epstein i believe now has 3 world series titles.Moneyball was a strategy which attempted to compensate for the fact the Oakland A’s were and are a small market, resource poor franchise. The Leafs are very near the polar opposite in hockey. Dubas will doubtless look for market inefficiencies to exploit but he won’t need to employ a full blown moneypuck strategy.
to me, hes just a new school style GM that uses newer forms of information at his disposal to form more complete pictures on decisions he is faced with. i never thought he was the "analytics" only type.I feel like people are vastly overstating Dubas' reliance on analytics. Everybody analyzes statistics to help inform their decisions. Dubas may work harder at that stuff than most, but it's not like he makes all his decisions based on CORSI like some people around here seem to want to believe for some reason.
Moneyball was a strategy which attempted to compensate for the fact the Oakland A’s were and are a small market, resource poor franchise. The Leafs are very near the polar opposite in hockey. Dubas will doubtless look for market inefficiencies to exploit but he won’t need to employ a full blown moneypuck strategy.
Literally everything that wasn't counted in the 60's like goals, assists and plus-minus is an "advanced stat", which just shows how behind hockey isAre things like TOI and G/60 really "advanced analytics"? It's just ice time and how frequently they score goals...
If that's "advanced" then I'm ****in' Einstein.
Valid point.
I always assumed management works together instead of competing against each other, so I doubt there will be an issue.
I doubt he'll extend Gardiner but if he does it'll be fineextend gardiner which would be the beginning of the end
it won't be fine if he extends gardiner. he does more bad than good. he needs to get off this team if we are to accomplish something other than a 1st round exit. if gardiner is extended i seriously question whether this team can win even more than i do now. i want everyone from the carlyle team gone. possibly even reilly and kadri if we can get good positional replacements back.I doubt he'll extend Gardiner but if he does it'll be fine
Not sure but we now know what Adam Goldberg will look like when he grows up.Fire Babcock and make Emilio Estevez head coach.
I see two potential moves: the first is to find an undervalued D man, second is to get into the habit of trading average top 9 depth guys who put up career years for futures. Selling high as soon as you can on non core guys.