This is fine but it's not an argument to keep every prospect right? I feel like you always caution people about being impatient with prospects or throwing them into deals, but a) you do have to give to get, and b) a significant percentage of prospects do NOT pan out.
I don't have much of a position on any of these prospects (aside from ones who've played in Boston already), but just because Frederic or any of them had promising years doesn't make them must-keeps right? Moreover, the Bruins have a glut of kids now, at least, that's the perception. I would argue if the hockey world is taking notice of your farm system, there's probably no better time to start moving a few. It comes down to which ones to move, right?
Totally agree. Besides Bruins followers how many services/publications have the Bruins system ranked as a top one? The Hockey News has it middle of the pack (take it for what it's worth), but how many respected scouting services have the Bruins with a can't miss group of prospects, and even then how many are looked at as impact players? Question marks on all of them, which is why they are prospects and not playing in the NHL.
While there may be good depth and a number of third and fourth line forward prospects how many are looked at as true top 6 impact players? Senyshyn? From the little I have seen I like his speed and scoring but will the scoring translate to the NHL? Was it just having mono that held him back this season from making bigger strides in the OHL or has he shown what he is and now needs to adapt that to the pro game? DeBrusk, Chelarik, JFK, Gabrielle all look like good third line prospects but does anyone of them seem like a can't miss top 6 forward? Bjork and Heinen may have the most offensive upside but that remains to be seen, Heinen to his credit went down, played well in Providence and seemed to have had a very good playoff, Bjork is still totally unproven and was not impressive in his limited time at the world championships. Frederic I like what I have heard but have not seen him play, I am assuming he is now projecting out as more than a checking center.
The D? Zboril has been a disappointment for the most part from what I have read, Lauzon has concussion issue I believe and I know nothing about Sherman besides Pierre McGuire likes him (not really a good thing IMO).
The point being that there is not one player there that I don't trade to improve this team, while you need young talent in your lineup in a cap league you also need top end talent to win. I do not believe there is any top end talent currently in the system that hasn't played in Boston yet. Your two top centers aren't getting any younger and all that is in the system are question marks (Donato and Fitzgerald I know little to nothing about but again nothing I hear beyond this board tells me they are top end talents). Rask is getting older with no goalie prospect looking like they are ready to take his place (I wouldn't even qualify Subban at this point, he has shown nothing to make me believe he is an NHL talent)
As far as this pick goes, number 18 in what could be a historically weak draft should not impede any type of trade. Yes there will be players who make the NHL after the top ten but none are even remotely sure things or even highly regarded. Move the pick, get talent for it or a pick in next years much deeper draft.
There was a Simpson episode years ago where Homer is having a yard sale, he puts out an old TV guide for 10.00 and says nobody will be stupid enough to give me 10.00 for this, a guy comes and offers him 10.00, Homer won't sell it because he thinks if this guy wants it he must know more than me and think it is worth more, he doesn't sell it and it is worthless. Don't make this mistake by overvaluing prospects, both the Red Sox and Bruins did it for years and Shayne Stevenson and Steve Lomasney didn't win them any championships.