HoweHullOrr
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 11,623
- 2,227
Ya, and Chicago lost some good players as I recall after winning their first Cup.We call this the "Chicago Shuffle".
Ya, and Chicago lost some good players as I recall after winning their first Cup.We call this the "Chicago Shuffle".
Well technically they don't have to resign Sergachev, Cernak, or Cirelli, so technically they are compliant. But resigning those guys likely puts them over $10m over the cap ceiling, so something has to give.
Well if they want to keep Sergachev, Cirelli, or Cernak they need to resign them, and they aren't allowed to be over the cap on opening night or they won't be allowed to play.So they have the next trade deadline and even next offseason to make decisions. An offseason that includes Seattle expansion draft and could even have a cap increase.
I don't think there's as big of a rush as people think there is.
I don’t think Tampa’s grand strategy is to not sign three good players and run an 18 man roster.So they have the next trade deadline and even next offseason to make decisions. An offseason that includes Seattle expansion draft and could even have a cap increase.
I don't think there's as big of a rush as people think there is.
They don't Have to do anything this season right?
So they have the next trade deadline and even next offseason to make decisions. An offseason that includes Seattle expansion draft and could even have a cap increase.
I don't think there's as big of a rush as people think there is.
All NHL deals are insured(I believe Nathan Horton was an exception) and all players are paid in full when on LTIR. Get yourself educated before lipping off
Edit, even more hilarious I was in a sense agreeing with what you had replied to another poster.
I don’t think Tampa’s grand strategy is to not sign three good players and run an 18 man roster.
No, they need to be cap compliant at the start of this season. Have you looked at their cap situation?
They have $2,895,834 of projected cap space with just 18 players signed. And, they have three RFAs to sign as follows: Cirelli, Cernak and Sergachev.
Tampa Bay Lightning - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
No, they need to be cap compliant at the start of this season. Have you looked at their cap situation?
They have $2,895,834 of projected cap space with just 18 players signed. And, they have three RFAs to sign as follows: Cirelli, Cernak and Sergachev.
Tampa Bay Lightning - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
No they don't have time and won't be compliant cause all 3 of those big name players are not under contract for the 20-21 season so unless you plan on trading all of them? then yeah you're compliant.I don't think that's their plan either.
They need to be compliant by the start of the 21-22 season....They're compliant for 20-21. Which is why my point is that they have time. Between Trade deadline, Seattle draft and next offseason they have time to move JT, Killorn etc to free up room....and nobody has ruled out a cap increase for 21-22 season yet.
So, you think they will run with a 18 player roster this season? And, what do you think the plan is for the three RFAs that need contracts? TBL is cap compliant with a 18 player roster and those three RFAs are not on the 18 player roster.I don't think that's their plan either.
They need to be compliant by the start of the 21-22 season....They're compliant for 20-21. Which is why my point is that they have time. Between Trade deadline, Seattle draft and next offseason they have time to move JT, Killorn etc to free up room....and nobody has ruled out a cap increase for 21-22 season yet.
No they don't have time and won't be compliant cause all 3 of those big name players are not under contract for the 20-21 season so unless you plan on trading all of them? then yeah you're compliant.
They're all RFAs this season.
I’m not sure what your point is.They're all RFAs this season.
Who are all unsigned.
Johnson and one of Cirelli or Killorn is gone.
At what date do they have to be compliant with the cap?
They don't Have to do anything this season right?
So they have the next trade deadline and even next offseason to make decisions. An offseason that includes Seattle expansion draft and could even have a cap increase.
I don't think there's as big of a rush as people think there is.
You're right....was thinking they had until next year's December offhand. In any event does the Dec 1st date still hold or with the schedule changes has that changed as well?"
And leave $30+ million on the table?Stammer probably retires, so that will free up some space.
Bettman has said that the season won't start until about Jan. 1. That's about the latest news on this topic. However, some of the talking heads have speculated that the season might not start until February even given the COVID uncertainty (resurgence, whatever).You're right....was thinking they had until next year's December offhand. In any event does the Dec 1st date still hold or with the schedule changes has that changed as well?"
2.98 mil cap spaceI don't think that's their plan either.
They need to be compliant by the start of the 21-22 season....They're compliant for 20-21. Which is why my point is that they have time. Between Trade deadline, Seattle draft and next offseason they have time to move JT, Killorn etc to free up room....and nobody has ruled out a cap increase for 21-22 season yet.