What makes Yzerman rated so high

Ziostilon

Registered User
Feb 14, 2009
3,829
23
I think he's ranked at around the right spot, but I don't know why. Only know its popular opinion.

He never won an Art Ross nor a Hart, however I'm not sure where in terms of voting he was each year.
and he didn't get it done in the playoffs until much later in his career.

Prime years are usually around 28 - 33 y.o.
He wasn't exactly spectacular, not finishing top 5 in scoring during that time
 

canucks4ever

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
3,997
67
I personally find steve yzerman to be overrated, IMO syll apps and bill cook were easily better than him.
 

HF007

Registered User
Sep 9, 2008
4,740
1,558
When he was in his offensive prime he was competing against Gretzky and Mario thus no harts or art ross trophies.
Another reason he is highly regarded is his transition into a leader and a defensive force.
 

Blizzard

Registered User
Feb 22, 2010
347
1
Sixth All-Time scoring leader. Had a 155 point season only Gretzky and Lemieux have had better single seasons.

10 All Star appearances (only one first team but consider the competition Gretzky, Lemieux, Messier...)

A Pearson, Smythe, Selke, Masterton, and Patrick.

3 Stanley Cups and a Gold Medal.

The epitome of a "Captain". Longest serving Captain for a team in history. Longevity, two-way player, and an epic performance in the 2002 playoffs on a knee that needed reconstruction.

Not sure the exact spot I'd put him in All-Time but with his resume it would definitely be in the top 50.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

Dimensha

Registered User
Jul 14, 2010
1,200
6
His two way play and more importantly his incredible leadership ability are probably his two biggest attributes. These two things cannot be underestimated. Most teams can only dream of having a player like him on their team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

Dreakmur

Registered User
Mar 25, 2008
18,634
6,894
Orillia, Ontario
Yzerman completed head-to-head with both Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux. Here's what Yzerman looks like if you ignore those two players:

Hart Trophy Winner (1989)
Art Ross Winner (1989)

2 x First Team All-Star (1989, 2000)
2 x Second Team All-Star (1988, 1990)


Hart Voting – 1st(1989), 2nd(1988), 5th(1987), 6th(1990), 6th(1992), 7th(1993), 8th(2000), 12th(1999)
All-Star Voting – 1st(2000), 1st(1989), 2nd(1988), 2nd(1990), 3rd(1991), 4th(1992), 4th(1993)


Points – 1st(1989), 2nd(1990), 3rd(1993), 5th(1992), 6th(1991), 10th(1987), 10th(1988), 10th(2000), 11th(1997), 16th(1999), 17th(1996)

Goals – 2nd(1989), 2nd(1990), 2nd(1991), 5th(1988), 5th(1993), 6th(1992), 11th(2000)

Assists – 1st(1989), 1st(1997), 5th(1987), 6th(1993), 9th(1990), 10th(1998), 12th(1985), 12th(1992), 14th(1991), 17th(1994), 16th(1996), 18th(2000), 20th(1999)


Between 1989 and 1993:
1st in Points with 117% of 2nd place
2nd in Goals with 87% of 1st place
3rd in Assists with 97% of 2nd place


Between 1988 and 1997:
1st in Points with 111% of 2nd place
2nd in Goals with 81% of 1st place
3rd in Assists with 100% of 2nd place
 

TheMoreYouKnow

Registered User
May 3, 2007
16,411
3,452
38° N 77° W
I don't know why anyone would look at a certain age to find a guy's prime. Yzerman's offensive prime occurred in his age 22 to 29 years, between 1987 and 1994, and at that time he had a point per game of 1.55, 3rd only behind Gretzky and Lemieux. Even at a time of "goal inflation" that's a stat of which you take note.

What really set him apart though was the fact that he could have gone on like that, he could have picked his spots and played into his high 30s picking up just goals and assists and he'd be in the HOF too. Quite a few scorers have done that. Instead however he adjusted his game and became a great two way forward for the better of his team and the Cups that followed doubtlessly had something to do with that. Mind you, he was still a point per game guy until 2002 in the "Dead Puck era" which given the changed focus of his play is pretty telling about the man's natural offensive talent.

If you look at career value, you get a guy who maintained a well above point per game career average over 1500+ games with quite a few of those games coming in an era not exactly noted for scoring, that's pretty rarified air there. Lack of trophies? Bad timing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oddbob and Sentinel

IggyFan12

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
317
6
Everything you need to know about Yzerman can be summed up with one shift in the 1996 Playoffs where he strips Gretzky in game 7 OT and fires a rocket to win the series.

As a Flames fan when he went down in 04 I knew we won the series cause Detroit lost their leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

Epsilon

#basta
Oct 26, 2002
48,464
369
South Cackalacky
Despite having seemingly flawless credentials when they are simply listed out, Yzerman is a bit of a tricky player to evaluate due to the dual nature of his career when it's considered on a year-by-year basis. I'd venture to guess (although I could very well be wrong about this) that he would be even more highly regarded (by historians, not by fans who overrate him to begin with by calling him a top 10 or 20 player of all-time, etc.) if his offensive peak had coincided with his period of team success.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,249
138,746
Bojangles Parking Lot
What really set him apart though was the fact that he could have gone on like that, he could have picked his spots and played into his high 30s picking up just goals and assists and he'd be in the HOF too. Quite a few scorers have done that. Instead however he adjusted his game and became a great two way forward for the better of his team and the Cups that followed doubtlessly had something to do with that.

I think this is what elevates him beyond many of his peers. It's not just about his numbers and awards, but his development beyond being a mere stat compiler. His two-way play and leadership, and especially the role he played in breaking Detroit's multi-generation Cup drought, push him into a peer group with the Messiers and Bourques of the era. Guys who carried that "all time" aura, and in their best moments seemed a little larger than life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrhockey193195

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
78,920
53,760
Despite having seemingly flawless credentials when they are simply listed out, Yzerman is a bit of a tricky player to evaluate due to the dual nature of his career when it's considered on a year-by-year basis. I'd venture to guess (although I could very well be wrong about this) that he would be even more highly regarded (by historians, not by fans who overrate him to begin with by calling him a top 10 or 20 player of all-time, etc.) if his offensive peak had coincided with his period of team success.

I would have to disagree. The fact that Yzerman 'changed' his game adds to his legend, as if he overcame huge obstacles to finally triumph.

Curiously, I would say that Joe Sakic was the same player, and his team success came during the peak of his offensive abilities. You could also say his entire career was a peak. Yet he's rated a bit lower than Yzerman for some reason.
 

ColdSteel2

Registered User
Aug 27, 2010
34,759
3,578
Great player played for a great team and was very clutch. Guys like that are always going to rated higher than their stats would suggest.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,249
138,746
Bojangles Parking Lot
Another thing about Yzerman that I just thought of: he never really played the "villain" the way some great players do. I don't remember anybody having issues with him, especially later in his career, so when retirement rolled around he was hailed as a class act by pretty much everybody. Contrast with peers like Messier, Hull, even Gretzky and Lemieux who had their haters for one reason or another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrhockey193195

TheMoreYouKnow

Registered User
May 3, 2007
16,411
3,452
38° N 77° W
Another thing about Yzerman that I just thought of: he never really played the "villain" the way some great players do. I don't remember anybody having issues with him, especially later in his career, so when retirement rolled around he was hailed as a class act by pretty much everybody. Contrast with peers like Messier, Hull, even Gretzky and Lemieux who had their haters for one reason or another.

Well he wasn't a nasty piece of work like Messier or quite a few other greats or a loudmouth like Hull or someone perceived as a "whiner" like Lemieux or Gretzky. I think the Yzerman legend beyond his ability as a hockey player to some extent rests on the fact that for a large % of hockey people Yzerman summed up quite succinctly what a hockey player should be.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
78,920
53,760
Another thing about Yzerman that I just thought of: he never really played the "villain" the way some great players do. I don't remember anybody having issues with him, especially later in his career, so when retirement rolled around he was hailed as a class act by pretty much everybody. Contrast with peers like Messier, Hull, even Gretzky and Lemieux who had their haters for one reason or another.

Probably because his cup wins came against Washington and Carolina, some more anonymous teams as well as Philly, which is a villain team...
 

Nemesis Prime

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
6,919
5,468
London, ON
Everything you need to know about Yzerman can be summed up with one shift in the 1996 Playoffs where he strips Gretzky in game 7 OT and fires a rocket to win the series.

As a Flames fan when he went down in 04 I knew we won the series cause Detroit lost their leader.

Happened in 06 too.
 

jepjepjoo

Registered User
Dec 31, 2002
4,726
2,033
Sixth All-Time scoring leader. Had a 155 point season only Gretzky and Lemieux have had better single seasons.

10 All Star appearances (only one first team but consider the competition Gretzky, Lemieux, Messier...)


A Pearson, Smythe, Selke, Masterton, and Patrick.

3 Stanley Cups and a Gold Medal.

The epitome of a "Captain". Longest serving Captain for a team in history. Longevity, two-way player, and an epic performance in the 2002 playoffs on a knee that needed reconstruction.

Not sure the exact spot I'd put him in All-Time but with his resume it would definitely be in the top 50.

What the heck are you talking about? He only has 1 post season 1st team all star selection (2000) and no 2nd team selections. Did you confuse all star games with post season all star selections?
 

Blizzard

Registered User
Feb 22, 2010
347
1
What the heck are you talking about? He only has 1 post season 1st team all star selection (2000) and no 2nd team selections. Did you confuse all star games with post season all star selections?

Speaking games not post season hence appearances. Understand the confusion because I mentioned the first team postseason selection in the same sentence. 3 AM clarity was not the best.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,249
138,746
Bojangles Parking Lot
Probably because his cup wins came against Washington and Carolina, some more anonymous teams as well as Philly, which is a villain team...

I don't think that had as much to do with it, as his generally clean style of play and spotless reputation off the ice. To be a captain for 20 years in an Original Six market on an elite team and never be involved in major controversy is quite the achievement. The worst thing you can pin on him is his friction with Scotty Bowman, which puts him in the same category as anyone else who ever played for Bowman.
 

steveott

Registered User
Mar 13, 2011
200
1
I would have to disagree. The fact that Yzerman 'changed' his game adds to his legend, as if he overcame huge obstacles to finally triumph.

Curiously, I would say that Joe Sakic was the same player, and his team success came during the peak of his offensive abilities. You could also say his entire career was a peak. Yet he's rated a bit lower than Yzerman for some reason.

And Forsberg was better than sakic! (couldnt resist...:laugh:)
 

Blizzard

Registered User
Feb 22, 2010
347
1
Well he wasn't a nasty piece of work like Messier or quite a few other greats or a loudmouth like Hull or someone perceived as a "whiner" like Lemieux or Gretzky. I think the Yzerman legend beyond his ability as a hockey player to some extent rests on the fact that for a large % of hockey people Yzerman summed up quite succinctly what a hockey player should be.

This and in a way I think having Lemieux and Gretzky above him helped because the media never focused on him as much or tried to compare him to anyone which inevitably results in a semi-hatred among the mixed camps. Lemieux vs Gretzky, Crosby vs Ovechkin, etc.. If Gretzky or Lemieux wasn't around and Yzerman was being compared to either at that time as the second best player I'm sure the Lemieux or Gretzky lovers would have taken more offense to him.
 

steveott

Registered User
Mar 13, 2011
200
1
I would have to disagree. The fact that Yzerman 'changed' his game adds to his legend, as if he overcame huge obstacles to finally triumph.

Curiously, I would say that Joe Sakic was the same player, and his team success came during the peak of his offensive abilities. You could also say his entire career was a peak. Yet he's rated a bit lower than Yzerman for some reason.

And Forsberg was better than sakic! (couldnt resist...:laugh:)
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,981
Brooklyn
I would have to disagree. The fact that Yzerman 'changed' his game adds to his legend, as if he overcame huge obstacles to finally triumph.

Curiously, I would say that Joe Sakic was the same player, and his team success came during the peak of his offensive abilities. You could also say his entire career was a peak. Yet he's rated a bit lower than Yzerman for some reason.

I pick Sakic over Yzerman, specifically because he was able to raise his defensive game without sacrificing offense.
 

Seanconn*

Guest
Yzerman completed head-to-head with both Wayne Gretzky and Mario Lemieux. Here's what Yzerman looks like if you ignore those two players:

Hart Trophy Winner (1989)
Art Ross Winner (1989)

2 x First Team All-Star (1989, 2000)
2 x Second Team All-Star (1988, 1990)


Hart Voting – 1st(1989), 2nd(1988), 5th(1987), 6th(1990), 6th(1992), 7th(1993), 8th(2000), 12th(1999)
All-Star Voting – 1st(2000), 1st(1989), 2nd(1988), 2nd(1990), 3rd(1991), 4th(1992), 4th(1993)


Points – 1st(1989), 2nd(1990), 3rd(1993), 5th(1992), 6th(1991), 10th(1987), 10th(1988), 10th(2000), 11th(1997), 16th(1999), 17th(1996)

Goals – 2nd(1989), 2nd(1990), 2nd(1991), 5th(1988), 5th(1993), 6th(1992), 11th(2000)

Assists – 1st(1989), 1st(1997), 5th(1987), 6th(1993), 9th(1990), 10th(1998), 12th(1985), 12th(1992), 14th(1991), 17th(1994), 16th(1996), 18th(2000), 20th(1999)


Between 1989 and 1993:
1st in Points with 117% of 2nd place
2nd in Goals with 87% of 1st place
3rd in Assists with 97% of 2nd place


Between 1988 and 1997:
1st in Points with 111% of 2nd place
2nd in Goals with 81% of 1st place
3rd in Assists with 100% of 2nd place

You can do the same thing for other players, as well. specifically Teemu Selanne... except the two names would be Lemieux and Jagr instead.

Yzerman was great, but he get's so much unanimous praise, while with Selanne, people rarely bring up that he had to compete against Jagr and Lemieux, like they do with Yzerman having to compete with Gretzky and Mario.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad