He is resigned. I think this season will determine long term viability of him staying.
While I’m a huge fan of his. His offensive talent is undeniable and he’s still so damn young.
I think he's young and talented and can be better still, but he is not as good as Kirby Dach and the Hawks will move him by the time he has arbitration rights at the latest. If, and this is a big IF, but if the Hawks plan to move on from Toews after his contract ends, then perhaps they will keep Strome around. But he needs to be a 2C, not a 3C.
I think he's young and talented and can be better still, but he is not as good as Kirby Dach and the Hawks will move him by the time he has arbitration rights at the latest. If, and this is a big IF, but if the Hawks plan to move on from Toews after his contract ends, then perhaps they will keep Strome around. But he needs to be a 2C, not a 3C.
The problem is I don't think Strome is suited to playing with fourth liners. He excels with higher skill players. He had a tough time in a bottom role in Arizona and shone that same year when he came to Chicago.How do they achieve that? Colliton said in one of his interviews that Toews and Dach are ahead of him.
How about this in the next year+?
DeBrincat-Dach-Kane
Kubalik-Toews-Reichel
Hagel-Strome-Kurashev/Nylander
Highmore-Kampf-Entwistle
I’m not totally sure that solves the Strome at 3C issue, but that’s okay skill/speed for him. I mean, Alex Tuch carries a third line with straight up fourth liners. I think the Hawks could maybe look to Strome to do something similar?
What I think will happen: Signed but will be traded in a season or so
What should happen: Keep him since Toews is already 32 and wont be there forever.
Unless we get Shane Wright next draft from a timeline standpoint trading Strome is dumb. 3 years from now Toews will be on the edge of retirement and if Strome is traded who do you have as the 2C after Dach? Barratt? David Kampf? Kurashev? Nobody capable thats who.
Strome is young enough to fit the timeline and trading him now or next season only creates a gaping hole in our lineup that we would be unable to fill in 2 years.
Team has spent a decade+ looking for a reliable 2C (Hayes, Kane, Anisimov, Bolland, Hanzeus, Richards, Teuvo, Schmaltz, etc) and now the moment they get one they want to trade him. Dach will be our only good center 3 years from now if Strome is traded.
The problem is I don't think Strome is suited to playing with fourth liners. He excels with higher skill players. He had a tough time in a bottom role in Arizona and shone that same year when he came to Chicago.
I agree. And if the concern is that you don’t want him playing with bottom-sixers, then you may need to consider bumping Toews down now.
Maybe the Toews line is technically the third line if you want Dach playing big minutes and with Kane? We almost saw that play out in the playoffs. Obviously you don’t give Toews typical 3C ice time, but maybe that’s just the role he plays going forward?
So like
??-Dach-Kane
DeBrincat-Strome-??
Kubalik-Toews-Janmark
I know everybody wants to play DeBrincat with Strome because they combined for a few nice goals but that's not an ideal solution. Strome likes to drive possession. His dream would probably be to play for a coach like DeBoer who's system is all about tiring out the opponents with endless cycling. DeBrincat is an excellent player but not exactly built for possession hockey. In my humble view, Colliton should keep DeBrincat away from Strome and vice versa.
So how should it work? You are always very quick to say every suggestion from others is the wrong way, but I haven’t seen you make one suggestion of your own.
DeBrincat and Strome literally both had down seasons being away from eachother that carried into the playoffs until surprise the moment they are back together they start connecting on plays and looked dangerous again. Dont break what isnt broken thats a small brain move. Strome and DeBrincat were at their most dangerous when they were togetherI know everybody wants to play DeBrincat with Strome because they combined for a few nice goals but that's not an ideal solution. Strome likes to drive possession. His dream would probably be to play for a coach like DeBoer who's system is all about tiring out the opponents with endless cycling. DeBrincat is an excellent player but not exactly built for possession hockey. In my humble view, Colliton should keep DeBrincat away from Strome and vice versa.
Drive possession? What?I know everybody wants to play DeBrincat with Strome because they combined for a few nice goals but that's not an ideal solution. Strome likes to drive possession. His dream would probably be to play for a coach like DeBoer who's system is all about tiring out the opponents with endless cycling. DeBrincat is an excellent player but not exactly built for possession hockey. In my humble view, Colliton should keep DeBrincat away from Strome and vice versa.
likely a bridge deal, not sure if he is part of the long term plan or not and that likely depends on the development of young players like Shalunov, Wise, Kurashev, Barratt.
I like Strome too some degree but he has to have the right mix of Forwards to play with and IMO that is a Shooter/goalscorer and a quick possession player with hustle and passing skills.
Shalunov is 28 in january he isnt leaving Russia anymore, Wise is looking pretty disappointing but granted maybe the NCAA was never the best path for him, Kurashev and Barratt dont really have a ceiling of a 2C. Only makes sense to trade Strome at this point is if they somehow get a top C prospect that forces him out since we will have a giant hole at the 2C spot. Once Toews is cooked we would have gone from having 3 good centers to only having Dach.
It taking this long to get a deal done is making me think he's seriously being shopped to other teams, who'll be able to negotiate with their cap space in mind.
Not to say it'll happen, but I can't imagine any other holdup at this point other than trying to deal him.
And count me as one of those who feels that we're pretty solid down the middle without him for the foreseeable future. Obviously we got Toews and Dach right now, but I look at a guy like Kurashev and think he could be a respectable 2C in a few years time; the Hawks scouts seem to really like him given those awards they handed out to prospects the other day.