Except the post which you said you agreed with?
What you perceive to be weak, and what is actually weak are two different things. He wasn't at fault for any of the goals, and he was one of the few players out there who gave a damn and was laying out hits. To me, that is not being weak and ineffective. But please, use the 'I have nothing against <insert player>' argument if you feel that makes you look more objective.
We are both subjective in this topic, I'm not sure why you are trying to make it sound like only one of us are. All we've got is our impressions, and the stats that you brought up and that I felt was luck-based rather than play-based. Another disagreement that is subjective for the both of us.
I know he was not to blame for the goals, I already praised him for the hits. Those are short snippets out of 20 minutes of icetime, in which I didn't like his game. It's not as bad as last night, which was on the level of the end of last season, but it wasn't average either.
And yes, I agreed with the general gist of what you said. Which is why I think it's a bit weird why we are having this conversation. We are sitting in a thread where people are in general calling him worthless, not NHL-worthy and a complete fraud, and we are arguing because I think he was sort of bad and you think he was average (I guess?)
Not a disagreement large enough to argue over in my opinion. Not with the tone you have.