Bleach Clean
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2006
- 27,045
- 6,611
This is my last post because this is going circular and I feel that I'm repeating the points.
It's not a matter simply of him suffering a major injury. It's contingent upon how he is recuperating from that injury.
Canucks don't need another winger of 4th-line/spare calibre, especially one that doesn't kill penalties. So if that's what they think Leivo is likely to be due to the injury, they shouldn't sign him at all-- not even with a pay cut.
On the other hand, if they are optimistic about his recuperation and his future status, then why would they risk losing him by offering him a pay cut, especially something in the 30% or more category? Given the market circumstances I would think there's a good chance that he might accept a one-year deal at the same money as last season. If he comes back as the same player that's a very good bargain. Lowballing in that scenario doesn't make sense as it would probably just chase him out the door. Remember that it's his kneecap; he'll know best how it's progressing and the better it feels the more confident he'll be about his contractual demands and his future as a player.
You've repeated yourself here, but I'm not sure why? The question posed was this:
Is $1.5m/1yr a justified offer for Leivo league wide? This accounts for his injury, the flat cap and his limited body of work.
If it's not justified, then you have your answer as to why he isn't worth 1.5m/1yr here. Regardless of feelings, confidence and perceptions. If it is justified, then we'll see him sign for 1.5/1yr+ elsewhere. Right?
The crux of the issue is determining what he is owed in this market and then balancing that against what the Canucks may offer him. However, we can't assume the latter without first establishing the former.
Last edited: