HoweHullOrr
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 11,626
- 2,227
I Think if he had stolen a playoff series everyone would like him. He hasn’t so can’t blame you for that. Maybe he can pull it off this playoff and then we might sing a different tune. I like him already. I would not want to commit to him if he doesn’t absolutely stand on his head this playoff. I mean just kill it and steal games. This playoff is his make or break year actually. He can’t lose in the qualifier or i will turn on him myself.#1 is goaltending, as it is for most any team.
I'm not an Andersen fan and therefore carry bias on the matter, but I don't think he's the guy and getting someone in here who can be is top priority. the lack of depth in the organization for goaltending is concerning.
which leads to #2 for me, which is rebuilding the prospect depth. It's even more important to find cheap capable players to plug into the top 9 and top 4-5 defence. a revolving door at the mid to lower end of the lineup is very likely as yearly juggling and short term deals will be the reality.
What if we see Mitch Marner get 94 points again or very close to that. Wouldn't that make it difficult to trade him, even though his cap it is more than Nylander's.I don’t think Nylander would represent the biggest cap improvement but he would be the easiest to move. The way he was playing near the end of the season makes it difficult to want to get rid of him though.
Go Boomer!
Tell us all!
What if we see Mitch Marner get 94 points again or very close to that. Wouldn't that make it difficult to trade him, even though his cap it is more than Nylander's.
The potential “Kawhi” move in all of this could be Toronto’s decision to go with another goaltender going into Andersen’s final season. Like what if they went and rolled the dice on Holtby and he rebounds like Belfour did when he got here? Or take a a swing at Jacob Markstrom and he turned out to be the long term answer?
What message would that send to big name UFA's if they did that to Tavares, because there was always this reputation how they didn't want to play in Toronto.Yeah, I probably wouldn't make any hasty decisions, and see how Matthews, Tavares, Lafreniere, Marner and Nylander all do under one roof while Lafreniere's on his ELC. Based on age alone, I think 91 would still be first on the chopping block for me, and that would be a difficult move, but would be happening in Year 4-5 of the contract so maybe it's okay.
What message would that send to big name UFA's if they did that to Tavares, because there was always this reputation how they didn't want to play in Toronto.
All of those players had wanted to play for the Rangers and were rumored for months they wanted to sign with them. Especially Richards because of his connection with John Tortorella and the fact they were allowed to match any other offers from other teams.It's fine. The Rangers signed Scott Gomez to a big deal, got rid of him a couple of years later and then signed Brad Richards. Then bought him out. Then they signed Artemi Panarin a couple of years later. Circle of free agent life.
What message would that send to big name UFA's if they did that to Tavares, because there was always this reputation how they didn't want to play in Toronto.
I would include the fact that he was named captain as another reason why.JT is not getting chopped, they are married to him. Like the deal or not you don't pull out all the stops to convince a top flight UFA to come to your team long term and then deal him as soon as you figure out you aren't winning this season. Plus the guy has a NMC. Does anyone really think KD has the stones to approach him to waive that when their window is still wide open? Or that he would agree if they did? This doesn't happen.
It's fine. The Rangers signed Scott Gomez to a big deal, got rid of him a couple of years later and then signed Brad Richards. Then bought him out. Then they signed Artemi Panarin a couple of years later. Circle of free agent life.
The idiot should have seen the pandemic coming from a mile away!
I always thought Dubas "promise" not to trade Nylander meant he wouldn't go calling other GM's asking if they were interested in trading for him. If a GM called Dubas and asked about Nylander I'm sure Dubas would listen to what the offer might be.Think about the sell job to bring him to TO. Think about Dubas "promise" not to trade Willie even when it was pretty obvious that was the smart move.. Tavares was the Toronto son coming home, #1 pick still in his prime, and captain of the club he was on. Gomez had one season with over 16 goals, was born in Alaska, and had no real connection to Jersey, NY or Montreal. Different kettle of fish.
Dubas won't deal players even without the NMC issue. JT might be the logical one but he isn't a realistic one.
The real game changer could be the Alexis Lafreniere pick if everything fell into place.
It could be used to really change the Big 4. Maybe we could look seriously at moving one of Marner, Nylander or Tavares for a big boy on defense. Or be used to bring in a big haul to fill in a lot of organizational gaps.
Think about the sell job to bring him to TO. Think about Dubas "promise" not to trade Willie even when it was pretty obvious that was the smart move.. Tavares was the Toronto son coming home, #1 pick still in his prime, and captain of the club he was on. Gomez had one season with over 16 goals, was born in Alaska, and had no real connection to Jersey, NY or Montreal. Different kettle of fish.
Dubas won't deal players even without the NMC issue. JT might be the logical one but he isn't a realistic one.
I'd wait a year before making that move, wait for Lafreniere to prove he's that dude
The answer is Andersen's contract because there is NOBODY in the system, Campbell included that can replace Andersen meaning Dubas either has to sign Andersen or swing a trade for a guy like Murray because Campbell is a good back but he is a backup and neither Woll or Scott are going to be ready in a year
Lehner is the silver bullet. I like him more than Freddy but there arent a lot of other options.