Yep. Some good pieces but the next two years is really the window with the older core pieces.
They're 29 not 33. Backlund and Tanev are the only ones I'm worried about in 3 years. And their contracts end at the perfect time anyway.
Yep. Some good pieces but the next two years is really the window with the older core pieces.
Nazem Kadri had the best year of his career, scoring 87 pts in 71 games. at the age of 31. Why can't Huberdeau do that or come close to that when he's 31? Three seasons from now, Huberdeau will be 31. Weegar is 6 months younger than Huberdeau.Yep. Some good pieces but the next two years is really the window with the older core pieces.
Overpaid but expected.
Overpaid in comparison to what exactly? Not market value, that's for sure.
Spurgeon and Lindholm are two very comparable players - look at their respective deals.
Overpaid as what he will bring to the table, he won't be a 44 point d in CGY.Overpaid in comparison to what exactly? Not market value, that's for sure.
Spurgeon and Lindholm are two very comparable players - look at their respective deals.
hes paid like a 0.5ppg d-man, but he will be a 0.2ppg d-man, and im more than happy if im wrong, i love the Flames!Overpaid as what he will bring to the table, he won't be a 44 point d in CGY.
hes paid like a 0.5ppg d-man, but he will be a 0.2ppg d-man, and im more than happy if im wrong, i love the Flames!
And MacKinnon only has his generous contract because he signed longterm after a disappointing couple seasons, after which he promptly broke out.
What the Avalanche did well was decide valuable pieces were expendable and moved them out. O'Reilly, Duchene and Barrie were all moved out for value and they happened to hit a couple home runs.
Weegar wont hit 30.I mean, Calgary just had four D go for record years; it's a back-end offensive heavy team. There's clearly no Makar/Josi back there, but there are now a number of guys who could go for 35-55.
Based on what? He will probably get quite a lot of PP time that he really didnt get at all in Florida. Calgary's d-core put up 205 points last year ranking them 4th for points from the blue line. The only change from last year is upgrading Gudbranson to Weegar.Overpaid as what he will bring to the table, he won't be a 44 point d in CGY.
Because if your team doesn't want to give 8 years, other teams will be willing to do so.
Something to consider is that lot of contending teams will need to rebuild a few years from now anyways, so securing a guy to help you win now is good even if his contract will stink in a few years.Let them make that mistake then.
Lmfao….Andersson and Hanifin got 50, Weegar can get similarhes paid like a 0.5ppg d-man, but he will be a 0.2ppg d-man, and im more than happy if im wrong, i love the Flames!
Weegar says Flames are a "better team" than former Panthers club | Offside
Recently acquired defenceman MacKenzie Weegar believes his Calgary Flames are better than the Florida Panthers team he was moved from.dailyhive.com
The Calgary Flames are a lot closer to winning the Stanley Cup than the Florida Panthers, incoming defenceman MacKenzie Weegar declared Wednesday.
Weegar, who was acquired by the Flames from the Panthers alongside winger Jonathan Huberdeau in a blockbuster swap also featuring Matthew Tkachuk, thinks his new team is prime to contend now.
“There’s lots of excitement,” said Weegar from the 2022 Flames Charity Golf Classic. “Obviously, coming from Florida on a good team and then coming here now, I’d say we’re a better team than Florida is. It’s going to be really exciting. I think a lot of people have come up to me in the city, a lot of fans and stuff that they’re really excited for this season and Johnny and I and [Nazem Kadri] and a couple of new faces here. It’s going to be a good season, and I’m excited just as much as they are.”
The rules have changed regarding how many first overall / lottery wins you can get. It doesn't stop teams from consistently picking within the top ten over and over. Colorado would still be able to assemble what they have for the most part. The changes to the rules won't change the impact that young, highly talented, short-term affordable stars can do for a hockey club. There is a slew of clubs that are still consistently drafting high-end talent despite your quoted rule change, and are positioning themselves to be some of the most dangerous clubs in the league. Time will tell if the Buffalos, NJs, NYRs, etc. can actually make it work, but they are undoubtedly better positioned than most clubs to win a Cup in the medium-term.No. You just can't rely on getting 3-4 top 3 picks anymore as the draft rules have changed. They changed in 2016. No teams have drafted their stars since then. You aren't going to draft a team with Malkin, Crosby, and Fleury..and then get another chance with J. Staal. That's no the way it works anymore. Under the new rules, you're lucky to get one star and then you have to build. The future champions will be more St. Louis and less Pittsburgh.
Sutter is also totally capable of coaching a team with the talent of the Flames, especially in the new league with more parody, to victory.
I mean I may be "nitpicky" to say that high-end talent matters but when your anomaly example for the LA Kings was a 2nd overall selection that was paramount to that team being successful, it only proves my point. LA also did a great job identifying highly drafted players that needed a change and fit their system. Credit to Sutter, he got the most out of Kopi (10th OA), Williams (10th? OA), Carter (11 OA), and Gaborik ( 3 OA). I hope he can do it again in Calgary and I do think Huby will help.Really weak and nitpicky argument. The LA Kings won in 2014 with only Doughty being drafted in the top 2 from their season starting roster. The Bruins won in 2011 with a 19 year old Tyler Seguin as their only top 2 pick on the roster and he only played 13 games in the playoffs.
Huberdeau was drafted 3rd overall. If all that matters is draft position then how is 2nd to 3rd a championship defining difference?
Actually the difference is one is just flat out better than the other.If Draisaitl is a superstar, so is Huberdeau.
The difference between them, is one gets to play with McDavid on the powerplay and one never has.
1340 players have stepped foot on an NHL ice surface over the past 4 years and Jonathan Huberdeau ranks in the 99.97 percentile among them in point production. If you want to draw some weird line in the sand in terms of what defines a "superstar" then go ahead.
They problem is your obsession with draft position. Was Doughty relevant? Certainly. What if the Kings had picked 15th in 2008 instead of 2nd, would Erik Karlsson have had a similar impact on their cup run? Probably.I mean I may be "nitpicky" to say that high-end talent matters but when your anomaly example for the LA Kings was a 2nd overall selection that was paramount to that team being successful, it only proves my point. LA also did a great job identifying highly drafted players that needed a change and fit their system. Credit to Sutter, he got the most out of Kopi (10th OA), Williams (10th? OA), Carter (11 OA), and Gaborik ( 3 OA). I hope he can do it again in Calgary and I do think Huby will help.