Post-Game Talk (GBU): We weren't ready to play

Royisgone

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
2,203
516
Just like in the tank years! The GBU thread with very little participation. At least we had one tonight, so there's that.

Someone mentioned we haven't given consistent effort for a decade. It's true. Going back to Lindy Ruff's last few years as HC, consistent effort, 3 periods of work a night, and coming out ready to go at the opening face-off have been consistent problems with this team.

Remember when Harrington called out BOGO and asked him if his team was "toast"??? Bogo said he believes in each and every guy in the room, blah blah blah.

Wonder if he thinks they are toast now.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
6,714
1,733
Rochester had an arguably more important game tonight against Syracuse, and they weren't going to let Wilcox (who, judging from what some Amerks fans are saying, may be worse than a tired Ullmark) play.

No joke. Who plays Wilcox over Ullmark? Well, maybe Housley
 

flashsabre

Registered User
Apr 5, 2003
3,962
3,462
Visit site
I was at the game tonight and what are you going to do. The Sabres 1st line matches up with the Leafs 1st line but lines 2-4 aren't even close. The Sabres need about 3 more highly skilled forwards if they want to go anywhere.

-They need a couple forwards who aggressively go to the net with authority.
-Thompson made a couple really nice defensive plays tonight.
-I really love Montour's game. Everything is crisp and quick with him
-Ullmark had a rough night

-Andersen made acouple amazing saves tonight to keep the Leafs ahead.

Ugly: Leafs fans tonight acting like Tavares was returning home after being released from a P.O.W. Camp after 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
23,605
28,587
If Botterill brings Housley back his future should be tied directly to the decision. When Housley goes, Botterill goes with him. The decision to just waste more time with an utter failure should have the consequence of losing your job when you figure out your mistake way too late.

The communication he praises adds up to nothing. They’re worse now than they were at any point under this terrible coach. And every time he says you can’t fault the effort he’s begging to be asked what we should fault...and why that shouldn’t be corrected.

They lose worse and more often than the roster should lose. This isn’t a bottom two roster. But for the last few months it’s a bottom two team. After being the bottom team under this coach last year. After not being the bottom team when he took over.

f*** outta here and back to Minnesota to never be heard from again.

Is that communication clear enough for you Botts?
 

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,140
4,701
“It’s hard to win in this league”

-Phil Housley 3/2

...

The teams you play every night sure make it look easy.

...

7 coaches fired this year. We get “it’s hard to win in this league” at the end of year two as they play worse than ever.
I understand Phil’s point. It echoes what others have experienced in history:

“It’s hard fighting these Indians.”
— General Custer, Battle of Little Big Horn”

“It’s hard making money off gambling”
— Donald Trump, bankruptcy court.

“It’s hard to sing”
— Milli Vanilli, Grammy clawback interview.
 
Last edited:

MagnumForce2

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
4,100
787
G-Better draft position
B-Window for playoffs closing fast
Cant win 2 in a row
U-Phil Housley is still our coach
 

ZZamboni

Puttin' on the Foil
Sep 25, 2010
15,399
1,449
Buffalo, NY
Why didn’t Housley challenge that second goal? Doesn’t make any sense.

Maybe I’m wrong, and if someone can post an angle or two on that goal ... but to me it looked like the Sabres Dman absolutely pushed Marleau into Ullmark. Enough at least, where it wasn’t obvious enough to challenge for GI :dunno:
 
Last edited:

Buffaloed

webmaster
Feb 27, 2002
43,324
23,585
Niagara Falls
"We weren't ready to play" is a load of BS. The real problem is we weren't ready to watch. Some of you were up and down running to the fridge getting drinks and snacks, checking the scores of other games, planning the rest of your weekend and running to the bathroom etc.. How do you expect the team to stay focused when you're doing everything possible to distract them?
 

tsujimoto74

Moderator
May 28, 2012
29,944
22,124
Maybe I’m wrong, and if someone can post an angle or two on that goal ... but to me it looked like the Sabres Dman absolutely pushed Marleau into Ullmark. Enough at least, where it wasn’t obvious enough to challenge for GI :dunno:

I also thought it wasn't GI, but I still don't get what Housley thinks he has to lose by challenging it, especially considering how inconsistent GI calls are. Might as well take the chance on a play that's at least close, right? It's not like he was saving that timeout for something better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joshjull

Kyndig

Registered User
Jan 3, 2012
5,147
2,862
Ristolainen is now a -31. That's just a fluke, right. He plays too much. Faces top lines. It couldn't be he gives up the puck in key situations night after night.

Goals while Risto was on the ice:
First goal Okposo blindly slapped the puck around the boards and then McCabe let Tavares whack at the puck as Ullmark laid there like a dead fish.
Second goal was a complete collapse, there was only one player NOT behind/on the red line and he wasn't even covering anyone. Puck was bouncing and rocketed off Risto's stick.
Third goal was an empty netter which has been tanking everyone's +- lately, not that the stat matters. I mean Dahlin was a +10? not too long ago.

It's easier to blame one guy than the team but blaming Risto for every single goal while hes on the ice is truly tiresome. Even ROR was a -23 here last season which was only 2 better than Risto, despite playing around 250 fewer minutes than Risto on a bottom feeder. Garbage stat is garbage.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
151,114
101,212
Tarnation
Just like in the tank years! The GBU thread with very little participation. At least we had one tonight, so there's that.

Someone mentioned we haven't given consistent effort for a decade. It's true. Going back to Lindy Ruff's last few years as HC, consistent effort, 3 periods of work a night, and coming out ready to go at the opening face-off have been consistent problems with this team.

Remember when Harrington called out BOGO and asked him if his team was "toast"??? Bogo said he believes in each and every guy in the room, blah blah blah.

Wonder if he thinks they are toast now.

What are we supposed to say any more? The team is badly run, badly coached, has terrible effort and regularly plays disinterested, uninspired hockey. They don't score, they don't pass, they collectively can't cover defensively and they make far too little effort coming back to allow their defensemen outlets. Their defense almost to a man carry the puck like live ordinance. And the goaltending has to be far too fine every night for them to even have a chance and is average to worse many nights.

So... what else is there to say?
 
Last edited:

jBuds

pretty damn valuable
Sponsor
Apr 9, 2005
30,885
1,482
Richmond, VA
Toronto couldn’t have hand picked a better opponent to play against after that Isles loss of theirs.

This was the most typical outcome in the history of everything.
 

Sinter Klaas

Registered User
Aug 19, 2006
903
168
Making Lists
When you give team chance after chance from the slot, your goalie is going to let a few in. After watching Lehner this year and comparing him to last year, I think it was the Sabres backtrack defense and soft coverage from 5 feet in front of the net that caused his depressive mood and Ullmark/Hutton will follow suit if the team can't fix it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad