carter333167
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2013
- 6,958
- 3,120
In all 3 cases the goalies were assigned to the AHL and stayed there until management's hand was forced to call up their AHL guy. That's not speculation or conjecture. That is objectively what happened. That's the same path the Blues have taken with Husso. The difference is that we haven't seen a multi-week injury to our starter in the first half of the season. We haven't had a backup who couldn't stop a puck through November. Yet. We appear to be going that way right now. Nothing about any of the 3 situations indicates that the organizations were committed to giving them a real look until after unexpected circumstances gave them an NHL preview to base that decision on.
I'm 100% in favor of the Blues decision to bring in a veteran backup. I don't trust Allen to get 60+ starts and I don't fully trust him to get 50 at the level we need. I don't know that Johnson was the correct guy to target, but I absolutely don't want Husso up here all season, being limited to 20ish starts throughout the year and getting those starts with the pressure of needing to deliver 12+ wins to what should be a team with 100+ point aspirations. Especially at the cost of him getting 40+ starts. Husso needs starts this year. Husso may very well be capable of being a better NHL backup than Johnson right now. But backing up full time instead of getting 40+ starts is not the best thing for his development. He has never played more than 41 games in a season and without another body (like Johnson) we wouldn't have the ability to shuttle him back and forth between the NHL and AHL to pad his start totals. We didn't have another waiver-exempt goalie in the system who could shuttle up and down with Husso, so we had to sign someone to ensure that Husso got 40+ starts.
I want to see Husso given an NHL opportunity this year, but it should be in spot start situations and not as a full time backup that can't shuttle back and forth. Given Husso's current numbers in the AHL and the state of our NHL D structure through the first 10 games, we legitimately could have destroyed Husso's confidence by now if he was the full-time backup here.
I'm of the mindset that at 23 we can't simply wait for an injury like we have been for the last 2 years. This season should be the season where he is spot started in the NHL over Chad Johnson occasionally. I don't think we had to do that at 22 or 21 and that absolutely wasn't what any of the 3 teams you mentioned did until unexpected circumstances accelerated their plans. I thought that going into the year and the performance of our goaltenders through 10 games makes it easy to justify doing it this season.
If I were coach/GM, my pre-season plan would have been to split starts roughly as follows:
Allen: 45-55
Johnson: 15-25
Husso: 5-20
Injuries have prevented us from having an "flexible" roster spot to shuttle Husso up and down so far, but I would have gotten Johnson 3 starts by now to see more of what we have in him. I'd be getting Husso up here for a spot start the instant we can. But Yeo seems hell bent on starting Allen 65-70 times for some insane reason, so I think Husso avenue for starts is likely going to based on whether Johnson keeps playing like he has been (as well as Husso himself showing some good starts).
I don't like how the Blues' net is currently being handled. I want to see our 23 year old prospect in the NHL sooner than later. But I vehemently disagree that we were mishandling him last year or the year before and that any of the teams you pointed to are examples of that. We had the exact same number of goalies ahead of Husso on the depth chart as the Bolts/Preds/Pens had in front of their prospects. There was no difference in commitment until circumstances forced those teams hands and we haven't had those same circumstances.
Thanks for your thoughts.
We largely agree on how things should be handled this year, particularly regarding Husso. Regarding last year, I also am fine with how they handled it.
The main point in discussing the other three goaltenders was to cite them as examples of elite goalie prospects who can shine at an early age when given the chance and to rebut a presumption (not asserted by you) that goalies can't be NHL ready before the age of 24-25.
Coming back to this year, I really do agree with your reasoning above and am puzzled at the early usage of Allen. Yeo, though, seems to making multiple puzzling decisions now (e.g., Bo on defense) , which usually happens when one feels desperate.
Thanks again.