Milhouse40
Registered User
- Aug 19, 2010
- 22,121
- 24,710
You mean... like us?I expect to lose him not because hes a good player but because hes cheap depth for a team with none.
No loss whatsoever
yeah I agree, lack of vision there by managementLosing Juulsen and Mete for nothing is horrible asset management, despite what we think of them. I’d get it if they made $2m+. But league minimum must offer some sort of value.
Obviously notBut league minimum must offer some sort of value.
And both are nothing players... What's to be upset aboutMete on waivers... What a joke ? They now lost (I am forecasting that he's gonna be picked) BOTH Juulsen and Mete for sweet nothing