There's a subtle but important difference; I was on the rebuild train but did think there was a plausible way for a retool. Benning screwed almost everything he could up, so with that vein yeah, I didn't trust him trading picks, especially since they were largely throw-ins on bad deals to begin with.
Pretending Rutherford / Allvin trading picks away is the same thing as Benning simply because they involve trading picks is missing context entirely. Rutherford / Allvin for the most part have been bang on in terms of their professional scouting, and the prices they're paying are turning out to be largely good.
You can't just blindly say that trading picks is default bad without considering whether we're getting good value in alignment with a credible plan, which is what so far things look like under our new management.