Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 65,270
- 49,897
It's only one year, and after a few years we can come to more rounded conclusions, but I can't for the life of me, given how unbelievably well we finished up last season, that anyone can say that Dorian has been just 'OK'.
I mean, give credit where it's due, and take it away when it's due. Most folks complain about his trades based on what they think will happen in the future, but really, we can't let suppositions of the future come into play when evaluating the now. Maybe in two years looking back we can say that Burrows sucks, Dahlen is great, Brassard is garbage and Zib is awesome, and boy those late rounds picks turned into special players for other teams, but for right now I can't see how anyone can argue that Dorian has not produced exceptional results in his first year at the helm.
Was it flash in the pan? We'll find out, but for now the results speak for themselves.
You don't get nominated for GM of the year by your peers when you just did an 'OK' job, come on now.
Its just my opinion at this point. Obviously the Sens had a great finish to a regular season that was good enough to get them to the dance. At this point I give more of the credit to Boucher than to Dorion but that's just me and I am not trying to sell anyone on it. Dorion hired Boucher which was a good move. The 4th line was pretty bad all year and Dorion took steps to improve the depth in the bottom 6. Boucher, imo, had a signicant hand in the acquisitions that would work in his system and that would gel with the team. I could very well be wrong about just giving him an "OK" grade but that's where I am with him right now. I don't think Dorion really did anything I would call special.